THE RACE FOR 2008

Liberals hate Sarah Palin. That statement is not surprising; there is nothing new about liberals not liking conservatives; it is the venom liberals displayed toward the former Vice Presidential nominee that is shocking. Hollywood, a land that supports feminism, attacked Sarah Palin with all-out vengeful detestation. The majority of Palin-haters are feminists themselves: those precious female equality fighters who have been fighting for years to see a woman in the White House. Those very women turned their backs on Hillary Clinton for a man; those same women turned their apathy toward a woman who stands for the all American female: Sarah Palin. They chose Barry Obama and his male VP pick over McCain and a female VP.

Alaskan Governor Sarah Palin is the quintessential American woman: wife, mother, she hunts, fishes, plays ice hockey, is a hockey mom, ran the local PTA, was mayor of her hometown, became governor and went after corruption in both parties—the reason Alaska calls Palin the “Barracuda,” Palin cleans her own house—the governor’s mansion, cooks her family’s meals, does her own grocery shopping, shops at Wal-Mart, buys her cloths in consignment shops—proving she knows how to get the best for less, and is despised for all the above and more.

1960’s feminists fought to be equal with men; they insisted they could do everything a man could do; when a woman who actually can and does ran for Vice President of the United State, feminists became enraged. Why; because Palin is a conservative.

Sarah Palin is the poster girl for feminism. Palin stands for everything women worked hard to achieve: she conquered the fight by becoming the first republican female VP nominee. Geraldine Ferraro did the same for the democrats in 1984, but it took 19 years for another woman to accomplish what women are still waiting for: the White House. Feminists and liberals, who insist they stand for women’s rights, hate Sarah Palin because she has two things on her record they want abolished: Christianity and childbirth.

Hillary Clinton gave birth, but Hillary Clinton supports abortion, and wisely held back from further reproduction in an over-crowded world. Sarah Palin does not support abortion, nor does she subscribe to the liberal/communist ideals of two children per family. Sarah Palin has five children, the fifth has Down Syndrome, making the child unfit in the eyes of liberal Darwinists. Keeping an inferior child scrapes against the grain of liberalism like broken glass on a chalkboard.

Adding insult to injured feminists, Sarah Palin’s 17 year-old daughter is pregnant, keeping her unborn child and marrying the father of the baby. In the mind of feminists the sexual act itself is liberation, keeping the unborn baby is disgusting. Subjugating one’s self to marriage before the age of 40 is the complete loss of one’s female principles. Marriage is slavery unless one is married to a serial cheater.

Hollywood actresses have babies out of wedlock and the world praises them, teen rock stars announce pregnancies at 15 and America rushes to their defense, when a conservative does the same liberals consider the behavior immoral.

Sarah Palin by definition is a real feminist standing as the voice for traditional women and feminists loath that.

Sarah Palin was the candidate who cracked the ceiling, not Hillary Clinton. Sarah Palin got the VP nod, not Hillary; Sarah Palin brought a return to pre-1960’s traditional American women and feminists scorn that. Sarah Palin is proof women can be women and achieve every goal dreamed of without sacrificing make-up and razors.

Leading feminists such as Gloria Steinem became ignored in lieu of Sarah Palin. Hillary Clinton’s supporters turned on the Democrat Party in favor of the conservative woman. Parents of special needs children had a real advocate sharing their life; yet hatred from the left and fear from the elite media ignited anti-Palin myths: Palin became known as a shopaholic despite the fact her clothing was borrowed and auctioned off to charity after she wore each piece. The media that criticized Palin’s wardrobe is excited to see the expensive haute couture Michelle Obama will wear to the inaugural ball.

Oprah Winfrey refused to invite Sarah Palin on her show during the election. Obama and Hillary Clinton were welcomed open arms. Liberal feminists of the talk show the View consider the accomplished, successful, well educated Palin stupid; Paris Hilton, the girl who will not wear the same dress twice because people might assume she is middle class, was embraced by the View and fawned over as brilliant for her cue-card-read ad on energy and drilling.

Beauty and brains did not upset feminists and liberals, the fact Palin believes in God did. Palin’s beliefs had the faces of liberals twisting in repulsed deformity. Believing in God means Palin tows the line, she believes in accountability. Liberals hate accountability, it requires adherence to right versus wrong. Palin meant the return to Reagan. Feminists viewed that as the end to freedom.

Democrats considered Palin unqualified despite being a two-term mayor now governing Alaska. Obama went from community organizer—setting up folding chairs and sticking signs on telephone posts—to a do-nothing Senator for three years, to president. Democrats consider a man with no experience competent compared to a woman who has been in public office for over a decade.

Sarah Palin is the role model for all women who want to accomplish their goals. Feminism has in truth held women back, making a mockery of equality by acting like men. Sarah Palin says women can be women and equal in a man’s world without sacrificing one’s dignity and gender.

After 200 years, when Abigail Adams told her husband “don’t forget the women,” democrats continue ignoring women.

On November 4, 2008 Barry Obama became the first black candidate—despite being half white—to win the office of President of the United States. The most liberal candidate with no experience and a sketchy past is now president elect and the United States will be led by a socialist with global, collective plans.

Barry Obama won due to skin color and no other reason. Blacks lined up simply to vote a black man into office. Philadelphia Black Panthers stood outside polling stations, intimidating Americans, stating they were “going to get a black man elected no matter what.” Young voters cast their vote for Obama because he’s black and they wanted to say they elected a black president. This was nothing more than a skin color vote, not a vote for competency.

Skin color and gender should never come into play when electing a president; the person who can keep America safe, lower taxes, eliminate earmark spending, protect the Supreme Court, defend the constitution, and reign in an out of control government should be first and foremost.

Ability and experience flew out the window in lieu of race: View co-host Whoopie Goldberg told Americans she never felt like she had a place in America, but now can finally put her suit case down now that Obama is president. Apparently Goldberg feels blacks were not American citizens until now. Black preacher T.D. Jakes, an alleged Born Again pro-lifer, but actually a Black Liberation Theologian like Reverend Wright, pulled an all-nighter on MSNBC telling Christians to vote for Obama rather than the pro-life McCain. Foolish Evangelicals, under the impression Jakes is Evangelical, listened and cast their vote for Obama. Once again the vote proved the majority of Americans are incompetent.

Obama won the election and the constitution is hanging in the balance. Under this new presidency the worst can come: the Fairness Doctrine to silence conservative talk radio, the Card Check Bill that allows union bosses to know the names of employees who do not support unions. That bill allows bosses to harass and intimidate employees into unionized submission. Every liberal bill designed to socialize America will be passed before summer unless Republicans can do a bang-up job filibustering.

The most dangerous thing to happen to America is an Obama Supreme Court. Elderly, ailing, liberal justices can finally retire and let Obama place radical extremists on the bench. The Second Amendment is in peril: Obama is anti-gun; he supports bans on weapons and would no doubt push for the elimination there of. Obama is pro-abortion in the worst way: he not only supports partial birth abortion, he believes children who survive abortion should be left to die rather than saved.

Obama has chosen his Chief of Staff: the partisan liberal Rham Emanuel of the Clinton Administration. Emanuel is known for not working with republicans and twisting arms to get what he wants—liberal policies. Already Obama is calling for a second stimulus package. $700 billion is not enough of a deficit crush; Americans need to pay more in taxes if they wish to look patriotic and not snobbish.

Before January 20 socialism will be instituted. This better be the wake-up call for conservatives. Four years is not a long time for one man to turn a Constitutional Republic into a Parliamentary Democracy. Conservatives need to take over the Republican Party that has become liberal and complacent. Democrats pushed Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to approve as many bad loans as possible. Conservatives warned an economic crisis would hit if subprime lending continued, but republicans did nothing to stop Barnie Frank and Maxine Waters, who defended subprime mortgage houses. The result was republicans and Wall Street took the fall for what democrats created in order to take control of the White House.

If republicans want the White House in 2012 they better start acting like Barry Goldwater and Ronald Reagan. Skin color and gender should not be the reason a president is elected, selecting a president who will defend the constitution, protect America from terror, shrink government, lower taxes, is pro-life, supports traditional marriage, supports Israel, supports the Second Amendment, and vetoes every pork spending bill is what America needs.

Conservatives have four years to accomplish the goal of finding that person. If they don’t wake up and do so they will regret it.

During the two years since Barry Obama announced his run for president there have been inconsistencies in his character proving he is unfit to hold the office of president. Contradictions rise weekly with little attention paid by the liberal media trying to undermine the will of the American people. There is simply too much evidence regarding Obama’s shady past and present for Americans to ignore on Election Day. Simply put: Barack Obama is a danger to the United States and its future.

Obama’s birthplace has been questioned: was he born in the U.S. or the homeland of his father—Kenya? When asked to produce his birth certificate Obama submitted a questionable copy that appears false. When asked to deliver the actual birth certificate Obama refused. This leaves the question of why? Is Obama American born or a Kenyan immigrant?

Barack Obama’s affiliations are dubious: Obama is friends with D.C. bombers William Ayers and Bernadette Dohrn, once on the FBI’s most wanted list for bombing the Pentagon, D.C. police, and killing members of their Weather Underground group. Ayers publically admitted he was disappointed more people were not killed. Obama claims Ayers and Dohrn were rehabilitated despite their constant anarchistic comments against America the past ten years. Obama insists Ayers and Dorhn’s past does not mean anything since Obama was eight years old at the time of the D.C. bombings.

Hitler died in 1945; that would mean the neo-Nazi Hill Billy’s who plotted to assassinate Obama this week are technically misguided and harmless.

In 2001, Ayers told PBS’s Bill Moyers he “is an anarchist.” That interview was conducted the month Obama and Ayers began working together. Obama claims to know nothing of the Moyers interview. It seems impossible a proud anarchist would hold his tongue with Obama, or anyone for that matter. Anarchists are bloviates; they do not keep silent about their hatred for government, police, money, and country. It is unlikely Obama did not know about Ayers past when working with him in Chicago.

Obama launched his senate campaign at Ayer’s and Dorhn’s Chicago home. Guests at the party were not on the up-and-up: Syrian national Tony Rezko attended and donated money to the Obama campaign. Rezko’s shady dealings sent him to prison for kickbacks. $10,000 dollars of those kickbacks went to Obama’s campaign. Rezko helped secure the purchase of Obama’s Chicago mansion. The mansion was sold for $1.65 million, $300,000 below the asking price. The adjacent land was purchased for $625,000 by Rezko’s wife who sold a portion to Obama for $104,500.

Obama denies knowing anything about Rezko’s business dealings despite working with Rezko in Chicago during the 1990’s.

Obama’s religious beliefs are debatable. Is he Muslim—he was raised Muslim the first eight years of his life in Indonesia—or is he a Jesus-following Christian as he insisted to Rick Warren. Obama’s faith is open to discussion since he opened the door in September 2008 when telling ABC’s George Stephanopoulos “Let's not play games… you’re absolutely right that John McCain has not talked about my Muslim faith. And you’re absolutely right that that has not come…” Stephanopoulos interrupted Obama by injecting “Christian faith.” Obama, caught off guard, quickly replied: “My Christian faith. Well, what I’m saying is that he [McCain] hasn’t suggested that I’m a Muslim. And I think that his campaign’s upper echelons have not, either.”

McCain’s campaign may not have suggested Obama is a Muslim, but Obama’s laid back, nonchalant slip of the tongue leaves Americans wondering why anyone claiming to be Christian would say “my Muslim faith” when asked about his beliefs.

For 20 years Obama attended the Black Liberation Theology Church pastured by radical anti-white Reverend Jeremiah Wright, a man who encourages blacks to turn on whites. Wright’s church supported the American terrorist organization FALN. Barack Obama has been linked to FALN.

Obama is friends with radical priest Father Pflegler, a white-hating, white anti-American. Obama has friendships with anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan and Code Pink founder Jodi Evens. Evans, an advocate for terrorism, is friends with Hugo Chaves. Evans founded the violent Animal Liberation Front that committed 600 violent crimes costing $43 million in damages. AFL was on the FBI’s list of largest domestic terror threats to America. Evans’s record didn’t stop Obama from hiring her as a campaign bundler.

Obama’s radical affiliations never end. The media does not care, proving liberals love terrorists and their supporters.

Obama’s loose lips express personal opinions of Americans in general: he considers the people of Pennsylvania to be gun-toting, Bible-clinging God nuts who “cling to God and their guns.” Obama’s wife insists “America is a down right mean country,” and “this is the first time in my adult life [2008] that I have felt proud of my country.” The comment says Mrs. Obama is neither thankful nor proud of Civil Rights, the fall of the Berlin Wall, end of the Cold War, women becoming leaders, a black woman heading the State department and more.

Obama is affiliated with ACORN, has received enormous donations from the voter scamming organization, yet denies knowledge of ACORN’s underhanded schemes. Not once during his campaign has Obama has called for the disbandment of ACORN. Obama received campaign funds from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac; he has not demanded the real causes for the economic failure be shut down.

During the 2007 presidential candidate debates, U.S. troop’s presence in Iraq was discussed. Obama stated: “I do not support the military.” Obama’s faux pas was dropped soon thereafter. Mike Huckabee on the other hand was harangued for a campaign ad in which lighting made brass shelves behind the governor appear to be a glowing cross. Despite proof otherwise, Huckabee was accused of trying to moralize America.

Obama’s pro-abortion stance is extremist: in 2003, Obama voted yes to partial birth abortion. Obama voted in favor of a law allowing Illinois children, who survive abortions, to die rather than be treated and saved.

In Obama’s first Book the half white Obama admitted to siding with those who hate America: “To avoid being mistaken for a sellout, I chose my [college] friends carefully. The more politically active black students. The foreign students. The Chicanos. The Marxist Professors and structural feminists and punk-rock performance poets.”

Obama is a socialist pushing for a collective ownership society distributing every taxpayer’s income. That is the change Obama offers. McCain brings Ronald Reagan change in the form of Sarah Palin—conservatism.

On Saturday October 25, 2008, Florida TV station WFTV news anchor Barbara West asked Senator Joe Biden a question concerning Obama’s “spread the wealth around” comment to Joe the Plumber. West asked Biden if the remark from Obama was Marxist, further inquiring if Biden’s “generated crisis” comment was a suggestion that the U.S. had lost its standing in the world. The questions posed by the anchorwomen led to the Obama camp boycotting WFTV from interviewing democrats in the Obama campaign.

Does this mean an Obama White House would be a press-censoring White House? If Obama were to win would the First Amendment become null and void; would an Obama White House pull the plug on reporters asking questions Obama does not like? The WFTV boycott proves Obama believes in censorship akin to Putin’s Russia.

Barbara West asked Biden if he is at all “embarrassed by the blatant attempts to register phony voters by ACORN, an organization that Barack Obama has been tied to in the past?” Biden denied any Obama ties to ACORN, claiming “I am not embarrassed by it [ACORN]. We are not tied to it [ACORN]. We’ve not paid them [ACORN] one, single penny to register one, solitary voter…We’ve registered the voters ourselves…I’m not embarrassed by our campaign.”

West pointed out that Obama was in fact an attorney and benefactor for ACORN. Biden denied those facts, once again demonstrating Biden is adept when it comes to using the Fifth Amendment.

The West/Biden interview took a turn to Obama’s “spread the wealth” comment with West giving Biden a history lesson. West read a quote from Karl Marx: “You may recognize this famous quote: ‘From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs.’ That’s Karl Marx. How is Senator Obama not being Marxist if he intends to spread the wealth around?” The caught-off-guard Biden asked West if she was kidding; is that a real question?” Biden insisted Obama is not spreading the wealth around despite Obama saying, on camera, he intends to just that. Biden denounced the question as “a ridiculous comparison.”

Any comparison between Biden and the adjective factual is also a ridiculous comparison.

It is obvious Joe Biden has no intentions of answering tough questions. Obama not only rejects answering hard-hitting inquiries himself, he will not allow democrats in his campaign to speak to WFTV. Mrs. Biden’s interview was pulled from WFTV by Obama’s campaign, proving Obama is afraid to have any truths exposed.

Barbara West did not flinch. West continued nailing Biden: “What do you say to the people that Barack Obama would want to turn America into a socialist country much like Sweden?” Again Biden did not answer the question, rather he acted as if Obama never made the “spread the wealth” comment: “I don’t know anyone who thinks that except the far right wing of the Republican Party.”

The fact Obama announced he wants tax-cuts for 95% of Americans when over 40% of Americans do not pay taxes confirms Obama wants to hand out welfare “rebate” checks to those already living off taxpayers. That is Swedish socialism. Obama wants taxes raised and medicine nationalized. That is Swedish socialism. The Swedish government has some of the highest taxes in the world—60% with value Added Taxes (VAT), making the GDP tax revenue 51.1%; Sweden ranks as one of the worst for fiscal freedom—32.7%, with one of the worst economies—Sweden relies heavily on trade with job creation ranking in the world’s lowest.

The Biden interview should be a warning to anyone who loves the First Amendment and the constitution itself: the fact Obama will not let WFTV interview Obama democrats says Obama does not abide by the First Amendment right to Freedom of Speech. Pulling the plug on interviews because one does not wish to be asked about the goings on in the campaign or one’s political affiliations is the enforcement of the Fairness Doctrine. If Barry Obama, whose birth certificate and country of origin is questionable, sanctions the press during a campaign, what would he do as president; threaten reporters who delve into his past; enforce appropriate questions rules?

West further questioned Biden on his own campaign rhetoric: “You recently said ‘Mark my words: it will not be more than six months before the world tests Barack Obama.’ But what worries many people is your caveat asking them to stand with him [Obama], because it’s not going to be apparent initially that he [Obama] is right. Are you forewarning Americans that nothing will be done and that America’s days as a world’s leading power are over?” Biden said no before asking a sexist question: “who’s writing your questions?” West should have hit Biden back with the same: who has been writing his answers during the campaign Senator?

Senator Biden gave further proof with his WFTV interview as to why Americans should not vote for Barry Obama: Obama is a Marxist pushing for a socialist country without freedom of speech.

Florida opened 200 of its 8,000 poling places to early voters considered disenfranchised by the 2000 election democrats insist George W. Bush stole from Al Gore. Early voting is not new, prior to this year’s election early voting was initiated as a way to turn out black and Hispanic votes. Barack Obama’s nomination has caused early voting to occur more widely. This leaves questions: is this a democrat-created scam by the Obama people pushing for an early election in case another Obama scandal breaks out?

One must wonder why democrats and the Obama campaign insist upon early voting when democrats have a record of refusing to count absentee military votes. Democrats never cared about voter’s rights until they lost the 2000 election to a republican. During the 2000 Florida recount democrats insisted blacks and Hispanics were denied rights to vote. Blacks never demanded a recount until the liberal media and Al Gore lied to the alleged under-class liberals insist live in subservient bondage under republican rule. 2000 was the year America learned blacks were no longer allowed to vote in America.

The result is the latest trend: early voting—everywhere. Early voting is a way to make sure black Americans get a chance to vote since they are incapable of knowing the actual day one is supposed to vote—Election Day. Obama and the Democrat Party have done their best to ensure those they consider ignorant and uneducated will have help understanding they must vote democrat if they wish to survive in a world where blacks are unable to subsist in without help from their betters.

Friday October 24, 2008 was Election Day all over Florida, as well as other battle-ground states. Michelle Obama insists early voting is a way for every vote to be counted. It is a way to scam the election if more dirt is found on her husband. If democrats can get the Obama vote sealed before November fourth they do not have to worry about another scandal tied to Barry Obama. Why else would democrats go to so much trouble to push for an October election?

Republicans are not demanding early voting. Early voters consist mainly of registered democrats. Republicans believe Americans have enough sense to know how to read calendars and get to polls on authentic Election Days. Democrats simply assume blacks are too stupid to read and must be hand-held all the way to the polls. Many black Americans proved this by falling for the early voting scam.

Another question that arises is the Pennsylvania court case demanding Barry Obama produce his legit birth certificate or his name must be dropped form the November fourth ballot. Pennsylvania Deputy Attorney General Philip J. Berg, a democrat supporter of Hillary Clinton, claims Obama may not be a natural born citizen of the U.S. Berg alleges Obama may in fact be a Kenyan-born immigrant. If Attorney General Berg’s claims are correct, and the birth certificate Obama produced is falsified, Obama disqualifies for the democrat nomination. Obama and his campaign have so far refused to produce any evidence to refute Berg’s claims.

By not responding to Pennsylvania’s demands Obama appears guilty of Berg’s claims: that Obama was born in Kenya, not the United States, he is covering up knowledge of his birth before the November fourth election, the document handed over by the Obama campaign in 2007 is fake because Obama is described on the birth certificate as “African-American,” a term was not used in the 1960’s—a 1961 birth certificate would describe a black child as “Negro” or Colored.”

Whether or not Obama’s birth certificate is forged is unknown, however, it does leave one to question the motives for on-demand early voting. Black Americans are targeted for early voting, not white Americans, unless they are on welfare, are low-income democrats with poor-man’s mentalities against the rich, and the elderly frightened into believing they will be left to die without medical attention if Obama does not win the election.

Democrats are using more scare tactics in this election than ever before. Obama gives hope for socialism and ruination of the top 5% who pay the majority of America’s taxes. Early voting is a sham to undermine the authority of the American people by handing everything over to the lower echelons democrats need for power.

Once early votes are cast, voters can not change their mind on the Election Day. The hasty votes have been secured by democrats and Obama; Americans will not have the option of thinking for themselves; Obama has done the thinking for precipitate voters he and democrats instructed to vote prematurely or run the risk of republicans refusing their votes.

This is simply one more trick in a long line of democrat rip-offs for control of this nation democrats want to become a socialist union of nationalized collective ownership.

Joe Biden has done it again. He once again let America know what kind of disaster Barry Obama would be if, heaven forbid, Obama were to win the election: “Mark my words,” Biden told Seattle, Washington on October 19, 2008: “It will not be six months before the world tests Barack Obama like they did John Kennedy. The world is looking. We’re about to elect a brilliant 47-year-old senator president of the United States of America. Remember I said it standing here if you don’t remember anything else I said. Watch, we’re gonna have an international crisis, a generated crisis, to test the mettle of this guy.”

When Senator Joe Biden is not falsely educating Americans with extraordinary historical clangers, Biden is making a meal of his designer shoes. Biden’s foot-in-mouth disease is one of the best things to happen to the 2008 election; he can not seem to help himself from campaigning for John McCain. Republicans everywhere humbly thank Biden.

Does Joe Biden know something he is not telling the country? Are terrorists preparing to attack the country if a democrat wins? The country has not been attacked in eight years because terrorists know George W. Bush will retaliate; the enemy knows Bush does not back down despite liberals screaming for an end to war and a desire to make friends with the enemy. Obama on the other hand has said he would sit down with Iran and talk to Mahmoud Ahmadinedjad. Is Senator Biden telling America the enemy is not afraid of Barack Obama and would attack because Obama is weak? That is the implication Biden made.

Senator Biden further stated: “I can give you at least four or five scenarios from where it [another attack on America] might originate. And he’s [Obama] gonna need help. And the kind of help he’s gonna need is, he’s gonna need you, not financially to help him, we’re gonna need you to use your influence, your influence within the community, to stand with him. Because it’s not gonna be apparent initially, it’s not gonna be apparent that we’re right.” Biden is telling Americans Obama will be the reason for another 9/11 on the nation if Obama wins the election. Biden is telling Americans they must stop step in and help Obama fight terrorists if he is president. Biden’s statement that Obama would need America’s “influence” and “need[s]help” from the people heavily asserts Obama is ill-prepared to be Commander and Chief of the United States military. Biden’s claims say the people would have to take control if Obama is in the Oval Office. Biden is giving the nation a very good reason not to vote for a man who is friends with American terrorists and wants to create friendships with Islamic terrorists.

Senator Biden plainly stated Obama is incapable of running the country and fighting the enemy.

Biden told the Seattle crowd they should “Gird your loins” if his running mate wins. “It’s like cleaning the Augean stables, man.” Biden may not know American history but he does know Greek Argonaut mythology. Biden does not know the exact date FDR became president, the television was invented, or if Hezbollah is still in Lebanon, but Americans be rest assured, Biden can clean horse stalls in one Herculean day. Obama however can not fight terrorism without the people advising him on how to accomplish victory.

How can Obama clean up Middle Eastern terrorism if he needs American’s influence to help him govern? It appears Obama is an idiot and America should vote for John McCain.

Biden further asserted “There are gonna be a lot of you who want to go, ‘Whoa, wait a minute, yo, whoa, whoa, I don't know about that decision” when looking at Obama’s name on the ballot. Biden is illiterate to history, but he has done a superb job with his Ebonics studies. Thanks to Biden, ghetto blacks now have a jive interpreter for Obama campaign rallies.

Republicans ought to thank Joe Biden. He is doing a magnificent job endorsing the man he once claimed he would be proud to run with on the ticket—Senator John McCain.

Biden realized his faux pas 45 minutes into his speech, catching himself by noting “I probably shouldn't have said all this because it dawned on me that the press is here.”

The presence of news reporters at Biden speeches makes no difference. Joe Biden can not help nor stop himself from exposing Barry Obama as the worse choice for president and Biden him self as a fool.

John Murtha was incorrect when calling the people of south-western Pennsylvania rednecks. A better statement might point out: if your name is Joe Biden and you’re dumber than a fifth grader you might be a redneck.

Former secretary of the State General Colin Powell announced he is endorsing Barry Obama for president. In a Meet The Press interview on Sunday October 19, 2008, General Powell told NBC’s Tom Brokaw Obama “has both style and substance. I think he is a transformational figure. Obama displayed a steadiness. [He] Showed intellectual vigor. He has a definitive way of doing business that will do us well.”

Barry Obama has a way of doing business with extortionists, terrorists, and fraudulent banks; Obama’s past is sketchy, his style and substance are nothing more than eloquent rhetoric designed to enthrall. Obama’s display of steadiness and intellectual vigor seem transformational, but Obama’s policies are socialism, not free market. That distorted way of thinking transformed Europe into a government-owned nanny state.

Colin Powell’s reasons for choosing Obama over McCain are McCain’s choice of Governor Sarah Palin as his running mate. Powell told Brokaw Palin is not ready to be president. Obama has been in the Senate less than four years and has done nothing for the state of Illinois except vote against capital punishment for violent criminals. Palin was able to get a multi-billion dollar pipe-line bill passed for Alaska, fire corrupt politicians in both parties, and lower taxes. Obama is against doing all those things; he is neither ready nor capable of being president.

Powell told Brokaw he does not like the fact McCain and Palin have brought Bill Ayers name into the race, connecting the 1960’s radical bomber to Obama. That statement is not surprising considering Powell did not like the idea of President Bush 41 and 43 taking Saddam Hussein out of power. Powell appears to have difficulty disparaging bad guys.

The former Secretary of the State described Obama as a man who “has energized a lot of people in America. He has energized a lot of people around the world. And I think he is worth listening to and seeing what he stands for.”

The problem with Obama is what he stands for: socialism, big government, government entitlements, high taxes, he does not support the Second Amendment; he is pro-abortion, supports partial-birth abortion, supports not saving children who survive abortions, Obama does not support the military, he voted against funding the military, he is against drilling for oil, gas, and using clean coal and nuclear power. America has heard Obama, he has said everything and nothing. Energizing crowds does not promise anything except showmanship. America does not need another celebrity president.

Powell said he votes for candidates he believes will make America great, the person he “believe[s] brings the kind of vision the American people want to see in the next four years. A vision that reaches out to the rest of the world, that starts to restore favorable ratings in America. Frankly we’ve lost a lot of that in recent years.”

Colin Powell wants a president who will hold hands with Europe and do what the world feels is congenial to the world’s masses versus what is right for this nation. 27 nations have become affable to the ideals of Germany and France; in doing so they have lost their individual sovereignty. The U.S. has reached out to the world and the world continues hating America. The basis for the dislike is the United States is a free-market economy with capitalism and private ownership. The world does not believe in those ideals. Reaching out to the world on the world’s level is dangerous; it leads to subjugation.

Despite Obama’s collective ideology Powell thinks Obama is exceptional. The truth is Obama and Powel are both black. If Obama were white Powell would not endorse him. Most blacks are voting for skin color rather than safety and economic prosperity. The lock-step mentality does not help America, it only helps welfare recipients. Barry Obama would not be the democratic nominee if he were white. Hillary Clinton would be the nominee and Powell would be endorsing John McCain.

Last night’s final presidential debate at New York’s Hofstra University was a win for John McCain. After two debates letting Obama slide on affiliations with corruption, terrorists, and suicidal socialist policies, McCain let the man no one really knows have his due.

The debate began with a one-upping on a man named Joe Wurzelbacher who wants to buy a business Obama would hike taxes on because Joe must earn $250,000 a year in order to pay employees. Essentially Joe would have to forego employees after Obama’s tax-hike because Obama told Joe he wants “to spread the wealth around.” McCain told Obama: “You were going to put him [Joe] in a higher tax bracket which was going to increase his taxes, which was going to cause him not to be able to employ people, which Joe was trying to realize the American dream… I will not stand for a tax increase on small business income. Fifty percent of small business income taxes are paid by small businesses. That’s 16 million jobs in America. And what you want to do to Joe the plumber and millions more like him is have their taxes increased and not be able to realize the American dream of owning their own business.”

Joe the plumber’s name was mentioned 26 times; what Americans need to realize is America is Joe the plumber. No matter what income bracket Americans fall into, if Americans own businesses they are Joe the plumber and Obama would raise taxes so Americans work for, pay income to, live for and by government rules.

Obama retorted in his socialistic manner, stating Senator McCain’s “centerpiece of his economic proposal is to provide $200 billion in additional tax breaks to some of the wealthiest corporations in America. Exxon Mobil, and other oil companies, for example, would get an additional $4 billion in tax breaks.” Exxon Mobil already pays over $300 billion yearly in taxes. That is one corporation. Total all corporations and they pay America’s taxes. Over tax corporations and American workers get laid off and companies move over seas where wages and taxes are cheaper.

According to Obama: “if you make less than a quarter million dollars a year, then you will not see your income tax go up, your capital gains tax go up, your payroll tax. Not one dime. And 95 percent of working families, 95 percent of you out there, will get a tax cut.” 40% of Americans do not pay taxes. They are low-income. The tax break Obama is speaking of is a welfare check. 40% did not earn a living, they will through tax-payers if Obama wins. 55% are middle-class making above $50,000. Obama stated if one makes $250,000 or more they will receive a tax increase. That would destroy businesses, jobs, and the economy for years.

Obama said he wants to end tax breaks for companies going overseas. Companies go overseas where wages and taxes are cheap because democrats increase taxes. Stop increasing their taxes and they stay.

McCain hit back asking Americans have been wanting McCain to drill Obama on: “The whole premise behind Senator Obama’s plans are class warfare, let’s spread the wealth around…the small businesses that we’re talking about would receive an increase in their taxes right now. Why would you want to increase anybody’s taxes right now? Why would you want to do that…when we have such a tough time, when these small business people, like Joe the plumber, are going to create jobs, unless you take that money from him and spread the wealth around.”

Obama insisted he does not mind paying a little more when the subject of Exxon Mobil reemerged. Again, Exxon Mobil pays the majority of corporate taxes, taking the burden off tax payers. Increase corporate taxes and they will flee to China.

Obama’s college plan is bogus. The entitlement attitude democrats brainwash American students with is welfare. Government should never pay for college education or educational choices expire. Allowing government to fund college educations gives government rights to decide what one can and can not learn.

Barry O attempted to use the Bush card against McCain, claiming McCain is “pursuing the same policies” seen over the past eight years. McCain hit back with a much awaited retort: “Senator Obama, I am not President Bush. If you wanted to run against President Bush, you should have run four years ago. I’m going to give a new direction to this economy in this country.”

From the moment John McCain became the nominee conservatives have wanted McCain to articulate those words. McCain made it clear he voted against bills Obama voted on; bills that “were full of goodies for oil companies.” The watchdog bit the thief and won last night’s debate.

Despite Obama’s Bill Ayers affiliation, Obama attempted to make the issue look innocent, saying Ayers does not work on the Obama campaign. Obama defended Ayers, declaring Ayers is a college professor who committed “despicable acts” 40 years ago.

Hitler his atrocities 70 years ago; Jews no longer have grounds to complain.

Obama let himself off the ACORN hook since he did not register people 70 times each: “apparently some of the people who were out there didn’t really register people; they just filled out a bunch of names. It had nothing to do with us. We were not involved.” If one worked for ACORN but did not actually meet anyone registering more than once, one is absolved.

McCain got under Obama’s skin with the discussion of free trade and Columbia: “Senator Obama doesn’t want a free trade agreement with our best ally in the region but wants to sit down across the table without precondition with Hugo Chavez, the guy who has been helping FARC, the terrorist organization…Senator Obama wants to restrict trade and he wants to raise taxes. And the last president of the United States that tried that was Herbert Hoover, and we went from a deep recession into a depression.”

Democrats need depressions; downturns create big government, handcuffing people’s rights under collective control.

Obama’s healthcare policy is government intervention versus doctor-patient care. Free healthcare means no freedom to choose treatment. Free healthcare means exorbitant taxes and inadequate attention due to limitations placed on doctors.

Commentators insist Obama won the debate through rhetorical expertise; that expertise simply mesmerizes audiences with articulate JFK-like phrases. Obama lost the debate. McCain was fired up, relaxed; he did not hold back; he hit hard and with answers and questions conservatives waited for. McCain proved he’s the better man to lead the country. Obama proved he would be better off leading Cuba.

Last night the “folksy” Sarah Palin whipped the American historian Joe Biden in the only 2008 Vice Presidential debate. After two weeks of ignorant questions posed by the condescending Katie Couric who tried to stump the Alaskan liberals despise, the laissez-faire ate Crow: Sarah Palin struck a home run.

If liberals were not crying last night they certainly are now. Democrats insisted on one debate, assuming Joe Biden would crush Sarah Palin with 30 plus years experience in the Senate. For every question moderator Gwen Ifill asked, Palin backed her answers with evidence Joe Biden does the opposite of what he says. Biden blamed economic failure on the Bush Administration despite Bush warning Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac needed oversight regulations: “the economic policies of the last eight years have been the worst economic policies we’ve ever had. As a consequence, you’ve seen what’s happened on Wall Street. If you need any more proof positive of how bad the economic theories have been, this excessive deregulation, the failure to oversee what was going on, letting Wall Street run wild, I don’t think you needed any more evidence than what you see now.”

Joe Biden should watch television; the media has aired proof Biden’s beloved liberals scammed America.

In 2005 John McCain warned Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac would cause economic failure if no oversight was placed on them. Congresswoman Maxine Waters insisted the opposite was true, insisting Fannie and Freddie were in great shape. Obviously democrats wanted fall-out or they would have put a stop to banking corruption. But that would have cut off their donations.

Governor Palin corrected Senator Biden’s claims that republicans ignored the problem: “Two years ago…it was John McCain who pushed so hard with the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac reform measures. He sounded that warning bell. People in the Senate with him, his colleagues, didn’t want to listen to him and wouldn’t go towards that reform that was needed then.” Palin tweaked Biden continuously throughout the 90 minute debate. The expert on presidential history and technological advances could not remember his own quotes. Palin listed them, a tactic that got under Biden’s grey skin.

When asked who is at fault for the “sub-prime melt-down,” Palin declared: “it was the predator lenders, who tried to talk Americans into thinking that it was smart to buy a $300,000 house if we could only afford a $100,000 house. There was deception there, and there was greed and there is corruption on Wall Street…we need to band together and say never again. Never will we be exploited and taken advantage of again by those who are managing our money and loaning us these dollars. We need to make sure that we demand from the federal government strict oversight of those entities in charge of our investments and our savings and we need also to not get ourselves in debt…It’s not the American peoples fault that the economy is hurting like it is.”

Biden claimed “two years ago Barack Obama warned about the sub prime mortgage crisis. John McCain said shortly after that in December he was surprised there was a sub prime mortgage problem.” Biden needs to invest in video tapes. McCain warned no one listened. Not listening made Obama, Dodd, Frank, Schumer, Reno, Clinton and the CEO’s of Fannie and Freddie wealthy.

Palin believes in tax cuts for job creation, businesses and economic grow: “we need to create jobs and really bolster and heat up our economy. We do need the private sector to be able to keep more of what we earn and produce. Government is going to have to learn to be more efficient and live with less if that’s what it takes to reign in the government growth that we’ve seen today.” Biden called raising taxes “fairness, just simple fairness.” He wants to raise taxes on everyone making $250,000 and up—that means tax-hikes on small business owners. Small businesses must reach that amount in order to pay rent, overhead, and make payroll. Placing high taxes on Main Street will cause job loss.

That argument came down to class warfare: Palin described Obama and Biden’s plans for America as “redistribution of wealth.” Democrats so hate that phrase, it disqualifies the dishonesty they’ve invested other people’s money in. Biden insisted redistribution of wealth is not what it is called in Scranton and Wilmington where he is from: “we call it fairness.”

In that case I’ll stick to calling it class war-fairness. I wouldn’t want to hurt the feelings of the liberal over-privileged.

Biden insisted an Obama presidency would stop big oil companies from robbing people. Palin pointed out Alaskan oil companies are afraid of her “bless their hearts, [and] they’re doing what they need to do:” Palin broke up Alaskan oil monopolies, making them play nice. Biden never learned to twist crook’s arms, neither has Obama, they would have to twist each other’s arms. Biden and Obama are so crooked they would tangle.

Palin affirmed the U.S. pays $700 billion per year to foreign countries, “who do not like us,” for energy the U.S. has in abundance. The U.S. would have plenty of money if $700 billion was not sent overseas for oil; it would also pay for the crisis, but taking money from Saudis might starve them, bless their hearts.

Obama and Biden agree with Palin that marriage is between a man and woman only. If only we could get gays to protest Saudis as anti-gay and demand drilling in the U.S., the U.S. would be fabulously energy independent.

As for Iraq, Palin wisely noted a timeline is impossible; winning the war is important. Biden insists he and Obama would begin withdrawal of troops within 16 months of entering the White House. Palin pointed out dangers in leaving Iraq before victory: it would leave Iraq open to Iran who threatens Israel.

Both candidates agreed a nuclear Iran is a threat to Israel. Biden supports Israel despite the fact his running mate wishes to sit down with Ahmadinedjad and make friends, a fact Biden denied. Palin verified Obama said otherwise in debates. Biden continued denying quotes floating around YouTube. I’m surprised; didn’t FDR make his own YouTube video after he ordered Enola Gay to drop the Atomic Bomb before invading Korea and Vietnam?

Last night’s debate was a slam dunk for Palin. Those who thought she knew nothing beyond skinning moose were thwarted. Palin proved she understands politics. Biden demonstrated he suffers amnesia—he couldn’t remember presidential candidate debates. Palin watched them and recollected.

Biden need not worry, I’m sure McCain’s healthcare plan includes help for the mentally dull.

Dinner $28,000, Dancing to a Barbara Streisand performance $2,500, Electing Barack Obama President very costly

On September 16, 2008 Barbara Streisand hosted a fund-raiser dinner at the Greystone Mansion in Beverly Hills for Barry Obama. Dinner guests dished out $28,000 per plate plus an extra $2,500 to listen to Streisand sing. Guests who simply wanted to support Obama and hear a liberal sing paid $2,500 for the ballroom show. The total raised for the biggest fund-raiser of the election cycle is estimated at $9 million dollars and will be split between Obama and the Democratic National Committee.

Barry Obama has spent two years on the campaign trail castigating republicans as wealthy, greedy people who live, spend lavishly, and force the lower and middle-classes to pay America’s tax bulk. Obama’s campaign ads claim most Americans can not afford groceries, yet Obama spent an evening with Hollywood elites eating a dinner costing $31,000 dollars for which he received $4.5 million dollars.

Most Americans can not afford a $31 dollar dinner, but they are told to vote for Barry Obama, a privileged influential leader who lives as extravagantly and spends as freely as those he condemns.

Obama and his elite followers live in a vacuum of deceit; they believe they can have it all but no one else should. Obama ridicules the wealthy top 5% who, in fact, pays the bulk of America’s taxes; he claims the poor pay the way of the exploitive rich. Obama accomplishes this by playing on fears he creates with his ideological campaign ads. His latest two minute pseudo-presidential address to the nation states Americans “are paying more than ever for health insurance that covers less and less…the truth is you’re [Americans] living up to your responsibilities, but Washington has not.”

The truth is democrats created high taxes, high costs, and difficult economic situations in order to keep themselves in power. If the economy was not in trouble democrats would claim there is a recession. Without a failing economy democrats have no power.

Obama tells Americans the U.S. economy’s woes are worse than ever and will not be easy to fix; he declares the economy is the number one issue on the minds of the people who are struggling to pay bills; he states “600,000 Americans have lost jobs since January” 2008 and “paychecks are flat and home values are falling. It’s hard to pay for gas and groceries and if you put it on a credit card they’ve [Washington] probably raised your rates.”

Where was Obama’s responsibility for the economy on September 16^th when he attended a $31,000 dollar a plate dinner to benefit him?

Streisand’s fundraiser does not help those Americans liberals claim are in need: the poor whom freethinkers claim to champion. Streisand’s party did not raise money to pay the mortgages, healthcare, groceries, credit card bills, and gas for Americans the tolerant insist were ruined by republicans and George W. Bush. It is easier to blame everything on republicans instead of democrats in control of the House and Senate. Blaming the Bush Administration, who questioned the actions of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac more than two years ago concerning loans to people who can not pay mortgages, is better than admitting the truth: Americans who can not afford homes should never receive bank loans to purchase what the government calls affordable housing.

Obama will not tell Americans what affordable housing is: government-paid housing, welfare-state homes paid for by tax payers when the loans can’t be met. That is exactly what Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac did: they gave money for welfare-state housing.

The two banks gave over $100,000 dollars to Obama’s campaign. Obama was the second biggest recipient from Fannie and Freddie in cash next to Connecticut Democrat Senator Chris Dodd. Obama does not divulge this fact because it proves he accepted money from the very people he condemns for the alleged low-income housing crisis. Over the years McCain received a paltry $20,000 from the two banks. It’s obvious which candidate those two banks want running the country.

Obama has attempted to convey himself as a reformer who will save everyone who lost their homes to the very people who donated a fortune to his campaign. Obama does not want the U.S. to profit or he would not insist upon redistribution of wealth and raising taxes on the top 5% and middle-class business owners.

Obama has done nothing for the Illinois people during his three years in the Senate; he never went after the banks who donated to his campaign or those involved in the housing loans; he has no problem however taking money his supporters do not have, money he insists they need; nor did he flinch at accepting $4.5 million dollars from Hollywood do-gooders.

The $28,000 dollar a plate/$2,500 a dance Hollywood party was a multimillion dollar Obamathon attended by the cream of the crop celebrity rich who willingly exploit their wealth to buy socialist candidates. Liberal elites gladly spend millions in donations to socialist agenda campaigns that scream there is poverty in America. The broadminded do-gooders however will never bother to help America because this country is not Africa.

Obama told his Hollywood followers that he was “not in a celebrity mood” despite showing up to the expensive celebrity event. The gods of the left coast were astonished the ultimate celebrity was not in the elite mood. Obama notified the crowd of wealthy stars that the economy is “stumbling” and America has “gotten off track” and “much of this [his] campaign has been consumed by petty attacks and distractions that have nothing to do with you or how we get America back on track.”

The country got off track when the democrats took over the House and Senate, promising to fix an economy that was not in the tank until Harry and Nancy got their hands on the books being cooked by those paying the dems way.

The pig is wearing very expensive lipstick the United States can not afford to buy.

She’s 44 years-old, a two-time mayor and Governor of Alaska, she’s a chainsaw-wielding, tree chopping, ice hockey playing, life-time member of the National Rifle Association who hunts, fishes, runs marathons and grew up working with her hands and she’s not a lesbian. She’s the first female Republican Vice Presidential nominee in U.S. history: her name is Sarah Palin.

Governor Sarah Palin may very well turn out to be the one person who can save the Republican Party. Palin’s an outsider with real conservative maverick beliefs and a 90% approval rating: she’s Evangelical born and raised, pro-life, against stem cell research, the mother of five children, her new born has Down Syndrome and she did not abort him like many American women have done to special needs children for being imperfect, her oldest son enlisted in the military and will be deployed to Iraq next week.

Palin vetoed 13% of Alaska’s proposed budget for capital projects, cut taxes, stood up against the corrupt political machine in both parties: she forced Alaskan State Chairman Randy Ruderich to pay a $12,000 dollar fine for breaking the state ethics law, lodged an ethics complaint against Alaska Attorney General Renkes and his campaign manager, forcing Renkes to resign.

Palin signed the bill to construct a $40 billion dollar natural gas pipeline in Alaska when both parties said it could not be done, and Sarah Palin believes in drilling for oil in her state versus living beholden to Saudi terrorists. Even Hillary Clinton took Mrs. Palin’s side against democrats who criticized the 44 year-old as being too young and inexperienced to be next in line for the presidency.

Joe Biden may want to duck when Governor Palin enters the debate arena, Sarah Palin’s political firings are known as “the body count.”

The liberal media will tear Sarah Palin apart because she’s conservative and her 17 year-old daughter is pregnant. On the other hand if Mrs. Palin’s daughter were to abort the unborn child liberals would praise Palin as the best thing to happen to America since the ACLU, the IRS, Roe v. Wade, Justice Earl Warren, Ernesto Miranda, the Kennedy’s, the Clinton’s, The New Deal and the Great Society.

Mrs. Palin’s daughter is no different from many young American girls who find out consequences come with certain decisions. When all is said and done conservatives don’t simply look at how one conducts one’s life, rather what one does when conduct turns the tables. Mrs. Palin’s daughter will prove, that in the end, despite a choice that left consequences, her mother’s pro-life morals took hold. It is the decision young girls make afterward that tells us the true character.

Governor Palin could have shipped her daughter off to a clinic in Canada for a secret abortion, making the public believe her daughter was on a wilderness camping trip. Instead, the values and morals she taught her children are being displayed in the young Bristol who is keeping her baby and marrying the father unlike Hollywood starlets who pop out babies without wedding rings every week and get hailed as role models.

Liberals have already cut the wood for the crucifixion cross and the media has nothing better to do for its lowly ratings than to go after a pro-life teen, but the unwed teen pregnancy will not hinder McCain’s choosing Palin. Palin told McCain her daughter was pregnant when he asked her to be his running mate. McCain did not turn Palin down, proving he really is a pro-life politician not worried about a pregnant teen destroying his candidacy. Not many liberals would have chosen Palin; they would have chosen to save their reputations.

Anyone foolish enough to attempt the destruction of this Palin’s campaign because her daughter chose life over abortion is helping the defeat of the pro-partial birth abortion candidate Obama.

Governor Palin will never encourage teen pregnancy, she is conservative, she believes in marriage, but Palin is human with a real family with real lives. The Palin’s are no different than the average American voter; like many Evangelical Christians they are trying to raise and shield young daughters in an open liberalized society telling girls its okay to have sex; the Palin’s are fighting against the Hollywood machine, but in the end their moral values held out and won.

Bristol Palin chose life for her unborn child and this is what makes her an outstanding young woman.

Do not expect the feminist movement to commend Governor Palin or her daughter. Feminists believe in abortion, not God, family, and doing the right thing when life throws unexpected curve balls. Feminists push for teen sex, yet they do not believe in owning up to the consequences of sex: pregnancy. There lies the difference with liberals and conservatives. One group chooses life over death, one group chooses right over wrong, one group chooses self-sacrifice over saving face and career.

Many conservatives waited to see the Vice Presidential pick for McCain; this would be the determining factor for whether or not the Senator got the Evangelical vote. McCain made a very conservative choice with Palin, a choice that will easily defeat the dems and give America a future female president who fights corruption versus creating it. I think America may have found its own Margaret Thatcher.

MY BIG, FAT, GREEK CORONATION

BY LISA RICHARDS

September 2, 2008

The articulate Barack Obama is under the impression he’s running for president of Greece. The gigantic Parthenon back-drop for his nomination acceptance speech was a bigger insult to America than his radical wife’s calling “America a down right mean country.”

Obama’s change for America is obvious: make the U.S. an EU state.

The self-centered, anti-capitalism speech was a nothing more than a nasty diatribe against everything America stands for while claiming the U.S. alienated the world it should be seeking advice from. If Obama actually thought he could unite this country Invesco was a political Greek tragedy that won’t sit well with Middle-America. The last time I checked America’s founding fathers were not Alexander the Great and Aristotle Onassis.

August 28^th’s speech was directed to the world and low-income anti-Americans brainwashed into hating the wealthy. The speech was not pro-U.S., it was not directed toward those who love sovereignty, the speech was designed to make Obama the candidate for a North American Union liberal’s desire and the world needs in order to take down America.

After his inauguration as German Chancellor to a crowd of stupid socialists, Obama became the Emperor of Poverty, telling the story of his fatherless childhood, his mother who woke him every morning at 4:30 am to begin his studies, never mentioning those studies were Indonesian Muslim studies. He spoke of his grandparents raising, skipping over his entire U.S. education: he went to prep school in Hawaii on a full scholarship, and then received a full scholarship to Occidental. The Ivy League colleges he attended were ignored as well.

Obama described his mother as raising him and his sister on food stamps while going to college at night. His family struggled like the steel workers he met in the Mid-West. Again, no mention of scholarships and the best education Obama’s flock can’t afford or how Obama obtained his wealth.

Obama went from single parented middle-class childhood to Chicago community service, skipping over 20 years of his life. The real Barry Obama’s life was omitted and reinvented leaving people to ask who the real Barack Obama is.

The acceptance speech was radical: it thrashed America as a nation that allows only wealthy to succeed while starving everyone else into subservient submission.

Obama slammed the republican belief of making one’s way without government help and handouts: “In Washington, they call this the “Ownership Society,” but what it really means is that you’re on your own. Out of work? Tough luck, you’re on your own. No health care? The market will fix it. You’re on your own. Born into poverty? Pull yourself up by your own bootstraps, even if you don’t have boots. You are on your own.”

That make-it-on-your-own philosophy built and prospered this nation. America was not built on handouts, America was not built by the government Obama wants enslaving Americans with more government programs; America was built by self-determined people who worked for everything earned.

Obama told the crowd “Tonight, more Americans are out of work and more are working harder for less.” That is false. 17 million new jobs were created in the last quarter. More jobs were created in the last eight years than Clinton’s 23 million job creation administration because of tax-cuts.

Raise taxes and people get laid off. Lower taxes and companies can afford to hire and small businesses get created.

Obama slammed McCain’s chief advisor for calling America “a nation of whiners.” Obama may want to look at the low-income whiners democrats created. Democrats told low-incomer’s the government should do everything for them, and when it doesn’t they should complain. Perhaps those whiners would like to live in India and actually witness what true poverty and class separation is.

Obama whined about McCain defining middle class as making fewer than five million. Obama may want to look at the economy and the amount of millionaires created yearly from innovative middle-class workers. The middle-class has risen, many low-income have risen to middle-class by working hard, but Democrats don’t want their beloved poor knowing this little secret. Dems would lose their power. Keeping people down and out keeps democrats in control.

Obama said he will “stop giving tax breaks to companies that ship jobs overseas, and I will start giving them to companies that create good jobs right here in America.” Those companies were forced to go overseas because democrats hiked taxes on U.S. corporations. Obama promises an end to Bush tax cuts given to corporations and the top five percent paying the majority of all U.S taxes. If tax cuts are removed for the top five percent, the burden will move to the middle-class. Someone must pay for liberal pork.

According to Obama America is in a great depression, the middle-class is homeless, low-income are starving in the streets, tax breaks and tax cutting forces people to live in cardboard boxes, yet “the government cannot solve all our problems, but what it should do is that which we cannot do for ourselves: protect us from harm and provide every child with a decent education…” The U.S. Constitution gives Americans the right to be educated, but the government does not have the right to educate, provide and decide the rights of the people.

Obama claimed “our government should work for us, not against us. It should help us…it should ensure opportunity not just for those with the most money and influence, but the American who’s willing to work.” Obama is wrong: the constitution says the people have the power to decide and take care of themselves. When government gets involved in helping politicians receive and take while deciding what can be obtained.

The Greek god declared the elimination of Capital Gains tax-cuts and “lower taxes for 95% of Americans” and the “promise of equal pay for an equal day’s work.” In other words the top five percent must pay everyone’s way while everyone’s money is equally distributed. That’s called socialism.

Obama promised independence from foreign oil in ten years if he is president. However, America can not drill for oil in America. Obama says he’ll hire new teachers for U.S. children to “have a world class education.” States have individual laws, governors, and legislature for education and jobs, the President of the United States does not hire teachers, nor does he create new jobs for the country. That’s a fallacy by both parties.

Punishing CEO’s is Obama’s plan, rewarding cashiers without high school diplomas and skills is Obama’s aim, regulating small business owners with high taxes is Obama’s policy, compensating welfare queens who refuse to work, get educations, and learn skills is Obama’s objective.

Obama’s strategy for fighting terror is to pull out of Iraq and invade Pakistan. He further poked fun at McCain for saying “he ‘would track down bin Laden if he had to follow him to the gates of hell,’ but he won’t even follow him to the cave where he lives.” It sounds like Barry Hussein Obama knows where the man whose name sounds like his is dwelling. He might want to tell the U.S. Military.

The Greek tragedy tried to invoke the image of JFK with liberal clichés to poor-man-minded liberals and Hollywood elitists. Unfortunately for Obama his thunder was stolen 12 hours later when the mortal Alaskan Governor Sarah Palin was nominated as the first female Republican VP nominee in U.S. history and George W. Bush created another Gulf Coast hurricane to rid the south of blacks. Even the Clinton’s can’t top that.

www.lisa-richgards.com

The woman many democrats wanted as the presidential nominee never received a nod for second place from rival Barry Obama: Hillary Clinton is not the 2008 democrat running mate despite accepting the position Tuesday night; that crown was handed over to Delaware Senator Joe Biden, the man who told Brian Williams on June 28, 2008 he was “not interested in the VP ticket.”

Not that anyone believed Hillary Clinton would be Obama’s running mate. To choose Hillary is to pick Bill and have him in the Oval Office breathing down one’s neck for eight years when not peeking down ladies blouses.

It’s not surprising Obama selected a man with more brains and actual experience beyond three Senate votes. What is surprising is Obama opted for the man, who, in 2007 declared, “I would be proud to run with or against John McCain.”

Biden’s statement told America he feels McCain is an excellent choice for president. Biden never said he would be proud to run against McCain on Obama’s side. That’s because everyone assumed Hillary would be the nominee. Biden slammed the “clean,” “articulate, young man” during the 2007 democrat debates as “not qualified to run this country.” Biden told Americans “the presidency is not something that lends itself to on the job training.” Biden never said that about Hillary or McCain.

Further surprising is Obama picked a man who voted for the Iraq war, supporting President Bush’s decision to take out Saddam Hussein. Obama is the anti-war candidate claiming he voted against the Iraq war despite not being elected until a year after the Iraq invasion. Iraq is Obama’s greatest criticism of republicans and McCain, yet Barry decided on the candidate who voted in favor or bombing a tiny little country.

Then there was last weeks slam toward wealth: Obama, prior to his picking the wealthy Biden, condemned McCain’s faux pas about his personal holdings. Obama had a field day with McCain’s blunder about having to ask his financiers what he owns. Even the brain-fried Ozzy Osborne knows how many houses he owns.

Obama’s denigration of McCain’s wealth has major drawbacks: Obama’s a multimillionaire living in a mansion purchased through seedy dealings via financial backer and friend Tony Rezko, a convicted felon charged with fraud and bribery: on April 3, 2004, Rezko illegally accepted $3.5 Million dollars from Iraqi Nadhni Auchi during a party attended by the Obama’s. Obama paid less for his home than its value. The shady purchase hasn’t been investigated. McCain’s wife inherited a beer distributorship created by her working-class father making her the evil queen lording it over impoverished America where no one is allowed to achieve wealth unless they are republicans.

Why Obama selected Joe Biden over the fraudulent Hillary Clinton is beyond me. Just think of the money Obama could accumulate under the tutelage of the masters of bribery, theft, embezzlement, mysterious disappearances and deaths.

Biden does not offer those liberal qualifications. He does offer an enormous multi-mansioned compound that makes the Kennedy’s look like white trash. But you won’t find democrats criticizing Biden’s financial and property holdings. Nor will the elite media pass judgment on the Obama’s wealthy life-style. McCain on the other hand is the devil for owning $13 million dollars worth of property.

Obama should have chosen Hillary; the combined holdings of both underhanded families could replace Camelot with scamalot.

Obama settled on Biden because Biden can’t steal the show from a black man. If Hillary was chosen and Obama won, Hillary would be the history-maker/publicity-taker, not the half black/white first black candidate. Hillary would make front-page for becoming the first female VP in history, overpowering Obama’s racial status after the inauguration Hill and Bill would take over. Nothing out does the Clinton’s, not even skin color.

Biden thrilled dim-witted democrats Wednesday night with typical liberal rhetoric about growing up middle-class in Scranton, Pennsylvania and Wilmington, Delaware: His parents scrimped and saved like Obama’s family; all were forced to work hard, provide, and obtain the American dream stolen by wealthy republicans with no middle class backgrounds.

Biden may as well have used my words, because that is exactly what he implied in his speech: growing up without the best clothing, beaten up because he was not the tallest, his mother saying “Joey go out and bloody their noses,” and walk proud. That sounds more like Hillary father’s advice to her: beat up everyone you can to get ahead.

Biden’s speech, which followed Bill Clinton’s apologetic speech to the world republicans made hate America by fighting terrorists trying to destroy the world, was another have’s versus have-nots drill against republicans.

Democrat politicians never own up to the fact they are wealthier than their constituents they keep poor for the vote.

Obama chose Biden because Biden actually knows what foreign policy is. Obama may have majored in Political Science, but foreign policy to Obama is using his foreign upbringing used to grab tear-filled votes.

Senator Biden has been in the Senate since 1973, Obama has showed up on the Senate floor three times over the past four years while running for president despite no experience other than scripted speeches. Biden symbolizes old politics versus Obama’s unexplained “change.” No one really knows Obama, everyone knows Joe Biden: he would be proud to be John McCain’s running mate.

America knows Hillary and Bill: their record is criminal. Four criminals in the Oval Office would be too much competition.

Obama is no better than the Clinton’s: terrorist affiliations and radical black supremacist beliefs; the devout Catholic Biden is the only safe bet to make Obama appear all American squeaky clean.

Obama has no merits, no accomplishments, no resume, no real platform other than an Ivy League education and 140 days running for president. Even that has no merit. Obama has no concrete plans for change: he’ll cater to Iran, pull troops out of Iraq, leave America to fight terror on U.S. soil, abolish the Bush tax cuts, and punish wealthy Americas.

In reality all Barry Obama has is his skin color. If he were white, he would never have made it into the primaries and Hillary Clinton would no doubt be the nominee.

Hillary Clinton walked onto the Denver Colorado DNC Convention stage Tuesday night to a thunderous ear-splitting applause. Elvis Presley entered the building. It was obvious from the crowd’s reception that the democrat’s real nominee is: Hillary Clinton.

The screaming crowd could not be silenced; not even by a joyous Hillary Clinton who knew she had just won the nomination even though her name is not on the ballot. Hillary eventually spoke over the deafening crowd to begin her acceptance speech.

If the Obama’s and their supporters were worried about pro-Hillary protestors disrupting the convention they needn’t have bothered. Hillary Clinton achieved that goal on her own with a speech that over-powered the pseudo Jackie-loves-Jack speech delivered by a toned down reigned-in Michelle Obama the previous night.

The south-side ghetto queen was upstaged by the North-side upper-class queen.

Hillary Clinton stole the show and the proof was in the pinch lipped expression on Michelle Obama’s face that barely cracked more than two smiles as she listened to her rival destroy her phony husband’s even phonier campaign.

Hillary one-upped the boring speech by Michelle Obama by taking Mrs. Obama’s own words in a Hillary tone: “I’m so honored to be here tonight! I’m here as a proud mother, a proud Democrat, as a proud senator from New York, A proud American, and a proud supporter of Barack Obama!”

Further slamming Obama Hillary declared: “My friends, it is time to take back the country we love…whether you voted for me or you voted for Barack, the time is now to unite as a single party with a single purpose…I haven't spent the past 35 years in the trenches, advocating for children, campaigning for universal health care, helping parents balance work and family, and fighting for women's rights here at home and around the world to see another Republican in the White House squander our promise of a country that really fulfills the hopes of our people. And you haven’t worked so hard over the last 18 months or endured the last eight years to suffer through more failed leadership.”

Michelle Obama’s soft and demure speech the night before was lost and forgotten within minutes as Hillary declared: “For me, it’s been a privilege to meet you in your homes, your workplaces, and your communities. Your stories reminded me that, every day, America’s greatness is bound up in the lives of the American people, your hard work, your devotion to duty, your love for your children, and your determination to keep going, often in the face of enormous obstacles. You taught me so much, and you made me laugh, and, yes, you even made me cry.”

After every comment made by the Czarina of socialism, the camera panned to the militant wife of the supposed nominee: Michelle Obama was not a happy woman. Her thunder was stolen by the queen of thunder neither she nor her JFK wanna’ be husband can beat, even if they actually win.

Hillary told all fifty states, Puerto Rico and the territories she is grateful for their support: “to my supporters, to my champions, to my sisterhood of the traveling pantsuits.” Michelle Obama should have thanked the bombastic brotherhood of the bombing hoods.

Hillary further enthralled the crowd with soppy stories about a single mother and trampled-by-America vet trying to pay for healthcare and bills. Whoever believes those two people exist beyond Hillary’s speech need to mental check on their own healthcare.

Hillary may have told America Barack Obama is her candidate and “must be president,” but the speech was about Hillary and the retaining of her supporters she needs in four years when she reemerges to attempt the takeover of the White House.

Hillary told the crowd it was she who “ran for president to renew the promise of America, to rebuild the middle-class and sustain the American dream.” Never once did Hillary say Obama is the candidate doing those things. Hillary let it be known it was she who campaigned to make college educations more affordable and she is still working to accomplish that goal. She checked off a list of Hillary do’s for America stating “we will work for America again,” telling the crowd how together they will join America’s allies “in confronting shared challenges from poverty and genocide” and every other democratic plan never accomplished since democrats need poor, ravaged, and starved people in order to remain in power.

Hillary told her flock of awestruck liberals it was she who ran to stop discrimination of races and fought for women’s rights for 35 years. She cleverly asked the crowd if they were in the campaign for her or the Marine without healthcare and the struggling minimum wage mother.

Michelle Obama never once made her speech about America: Michelle Obama’s speech was all about her father and South-Side Chicago. Hillary made her speech about Hillary Clinton and why everyone should have nominated her versus a black man who won’t admit he’s half white with criminal, militant, and psycho religious connections.

At least Hillary can say she has only committed the first two since her husband never opened the Bible he carried eight years for show.

Hillary was clever enough to tell the crowd Obama would accomplish her own goals she could not wait to see him sign into law, complimented Michelle Obama’s speech, saying she will be a great First Lady. The same was never said about Obama. Hillary never once declared he would be a great president. That honor was left for Hillary to accept by telling the crowd she knows what it takes to run the country because her husband was president for eight years.

Of course Czarina Hillary could not let the night pass without telling the story of the time when women could not vote, her mother who was born when women could not vote, Harriet Tubman who fought for women’s rights—it’s always smart to prop a black American slave on the democrat pedestal—before claiming America only gives to a privileged few as a kiss-up to the welfare queens who are privileged to live off the taxpayers.

The fact poor people exist anywhere in the world was blamed on President Bush and John McCain who invented war and poverty eight years ago out of boredom when there was nothing to do but fight terrorist who attacked the U.S.

If I were a democrat I would be rethinking my primary vote right now. I would be rethinking Obama versus Hillary Clinton who won the nomination last night hands down. The night did not belong to Obama or his supporters, the night belonged to Hillary Clinton who made Michelle Obama’s daggering glares and tight-lipped expression worth waiting up for the 10:30 pm speech.

South-Side Michelle Headlines Rockbama

by Lisa Richards (more by this author)

Posted 08/26/2008 ET
Updated 08/26/2008 ET

All weekend Republicans and Democrats wondered whether Michelle Obama, the most important political advisor and surrogate speaker to her husband, would be an asset or liability to Barack Obama when speaking to convention Democrats and 40 million TV viewers at the Democrat National Convention’s opening night in Denver, Colorado.

Michelle Obama, the headline speaker of the evening, walked on stage to rock star applause by an enthralled and moved to tears audience after a short biographical video narrated by her mother and an introduction by her brother Craig Robinson.

Mrs. Obama’s appearance was that of her speech: soft and demure. She opened her speech by telling the convention “I come here as a wife who loves my husband and believes he will make an extraordinary president…I come here as a mother…I come here as a daughter of South-Side Chicago.”

Monday night’s speech had several goals: humanize Barry Obama, soften the Angela Davis militant persona of the pre-convention Michelle Obama, and make sure neither Michelle nor Barry look like wealthy Chicago elitists.

Mrs. Obama accomplished this by telling the Porgy and Bess story of her South-Side Chicago childhood, her father stricken with multiple sclerosis at 35 who struggled to dress himself daily to go to work making a living that sent her and her brother to college, his dying young, his presence she still feels is with her, and her rise to a law firm that led her to choose community service in her South-Side neighborhood where she met Barack Obama.

Much of the speech focused on Mrs. Obama’s father and her south-side Chicago childhood with hardly any reference to her Ivy League education. That was a greatly missed opportunity for a black woman from a low-income black family standing before America as the wife of the Democrats' first black presidential candidate. Michelle Obama may very well become the first black First Lady; her rise from what she described as a struggle should have been emphasized further and her education should have been stressed to the black Americans she obviously spoke to on what is no doubt a historic night for black America.

Mrs. Obama told the convention, “America should be a place where you can make it.” There Mrs. Obama is wrong: America is the place where all can make it. She missed the opportunity to deliver appropriate words, emphasizing the example in the fact she and her family have accomplished so much, showing how everyone can make it in America. That faux pas was lost as Mrs. Obama once again discussed her father’s illness and working man status with a choked-up voice saying, “This is why I love America.”

Though the statement won roaring cheers and applause, Mrs. Obama needed to discuss why she loves America after a year of controversial comments. The speech may not offer up much to criticize, but it lacked explanatory depth on why she says she’s proud to be an American: the products of the civil rights movement of the 1960s and 70s, the fall of the Berlin Wall, her husband being the first black candidate to make it to the nomination. America should be credited for this progress, but Michelle Obama couldn’t bring herself to do it.

Michelle Obama told Americans “he [Barack] introduced me to the work he’d done in Chicago…instead of going to Wall Street; he chose to go to Chicago.” Still, there was no answer to what Obama has done for south-side Chicago, and that is the lingering question: is Barry Obama ready, fit, and capable to become President of the United States? All Michelle Obama said of her husband was “Barack will bring us together.” She did not say how.

One thing both parties can say about Michelle Obama is that she’s not Teresa Heinz Kerry, who made a spectacle of herself four years ago at the DNC convention. Mrs. Obama never did or said anything that will cause trouble for the DNC her husband. The speech was carefully written and orchestrated to give Michelle Obama a new image as that of loving wife, mother, and community worker who loves her country.

After all the controversy this year, Michelle Obama sold herself as a woman who is not the angry anti-American liability to her husband’s campaign. She never mentioned or criticized the opposition; rather Hillary Clinton, the woman many democrats want as president, received Mrs. Obama’s praise, driving the crowd to thunderous applause.

The Obama’s problems have been elitism and controversial background. Monday night’s speech portrayed Barry and Michelle as the all American Ozzie and Harriet family. If the speech did not charm the crowd, the live appearance via satellite by Barry O congratulating Michelle Obama, who brought her children on stage to say “hello, daddy,” enchanted every Democrat, not to mention Republican reporters, in that convention arena. The close knit family appearance had the effect intended: tastefully dressed devoted wife and mother happy to stand by her husband as Jackie Kennedy did 50 years earlier.

Lisa Richards is a lifelong Reagan Conservative Republican from Connecticut who believes in America's constitutional founding as a Constitutional Republic. You can read more of her work at www.lisa-richards.com.

Advertise | Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions
Copyright © 2008 HUMAN EVENTS. All Rights Reserved.

Barry S. Trubama

by Lisa Richards (more by this author)

Posted 07/23/2008 ET

In a July 15, 2008, Washington, D.C. speech titled “A New Strategy For A New World,” Barry Obama reincarnated himself as Harry S. Truman with his own Marshall Plan he claims will “lead this country in a new direction” where he will not be “distracted from the most pressing threats that we [America] face.” Obama said he will keep America safe without placing the entire burden of protecting the U.S. on the military President Bush unnecessarily sent into in Iraq.

Obama used World War II as his analogy for his presidential plans. His correlation to WWII completely contradicted his anti-war stance: Obama explained how Truman and U.S. forces came up with a plan to “contain” the enemy overseas while creating democracy for freedom. In case Obama hasn’t noticed, President Bush’s plan these past seven years has contained the enemy on their soil, versus fighting them on U.S. soil, and helped the Iraqi and Afghan people build their own democracy for self-determination and sovereignty.

Bush’s plans on the other hand have been “overarching strateg[ies]… meet[ing]… challenges” Obama claims the U.S. has failed to accomplish. Obama has made these claims many times, yet he’s never been to Iraq or spoke to Generals Patraeus and Crocker. Obama talks about strategies, military force, and unhappy Iraqi people despite hearing opinions beyond Congress and media Armchair Generals.

Obama might want to wait until his planned visit to Iraq is over before making assumptions. It’s always best to ask those in charge of the actual fight how the war is operating, not pollsters asking people who get all their information via the New York Times.

Obama’s speech was based upon General Marshall’s plan and Harry S. Truman’s actions as Commander and Chief. The analysis basically claimed President Bush has not worked with anyone; rather he has acted entirely alone without the help of military instruction. Obama compared U.S. post 9/11 actions to Truman’s actions: “imagine for a moment, what we could have done in those days, and months, and years after 9/11. We could have deployed the full force of American power to hunt down and destroy Osama bin Laden, al Qaeda, the Taliban…the terrorists responsible for 9/11…”

Bush did exactly that: he sent the U.S. into Afghanistan to hunt down those responsible and take down the Taliban. The fact bin Laden has not been caught does not mean our military are lying around in poppy fields sun tanning themselves. Obama’s comments are insulting to the men and women fighting terrorists and searching for Osama bin Laden. Those days, those months, these past seven years have not been for nothing; they have been a fight to stop terror and contain it where it breeds.

As for the Civil Rights Truman: President Truman dropped two Atomic Bombs on Japan in 1945 and committed U.S. troops to Korea in 1950. The Korean War was the first full-scale war waged without a congressional declaration of war. Truman cited the 1945 ratified UN Charter as legal rationalization. Truman also declared he had sweeping executive powers to deploy troops to Korea. Truman insisted he had a responsibility to the free world to fight communism and “the congressional power to declare war has fallen into abeyance because wars are no longer declared in advance.

Obama’s speech never owned up to the Democrat-led Manhattan Project or undeclared Korean War; there was more concern that Bush may have alienated the U.S. from a friendship with Iran.

Obama does not recognize Iraq as a justified war since he did not vote in favor of strikes. Marshall’s helping to plot WWII and end the war with force however is justified since Marshall created a reconstruction plan. Bush has done the same since both wars started, but democrats squawked at the 2003 $87 billion dollar spending bill for Iraq and Afghanistan. It might have taken money from amnesty projects.

Obama considers the Iraq War gratuitous to our National Security. He claims the U.S. is distracted. We’re not focusing on safety, economics, and befriending rogue nations threatening Israel’s sovereignty: “We could have invested hundreds of billions of dollars in alternative sources of energy to grow our economy, save our planet, and end the tyranny of oil.” In that case, Bush should claim emergency economic powers and seize control of Iraq’s oil reserves. At least it would solve the problem of where to get oil.

The entire speech said everything and nothing at all. This is a man who has always voted against the U.S. military, never supported the surge, but has, to his credit, showed up for three votes during his four years on the Senate floor. Obama’s only record in the Senate is that of running for president, yet he claims he has the “sound strategy” for winning the war in Iraq.

Americans have heard Obama state he has a timeline and a plan. So far the Senator has not explained what that plan is or how it will be conducted aside from spending money where money is needed, staying where troops are needed, and then leaving Iraq when the job is done. This will allegedly happen by 2010 if Obama is elected president.

It’s too bad Bush never pondered such a plan as winning a war and keeping America safe from terrorist attacks.

Advertise | Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions
Copyright © 2008 HUMAN EVENTS. All Rights Reserved.

On June 7, 2008, Presidential Candidate Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton told America she is “throwing her support behind Barack Obama” whom she now fully endorses for President of the United States.

The fact is Hillary’s campaign is over and no one wants to support a loser. Hillary has no choice but to endorse Obama if she wants to salvage her sinking political career that sunk as low as Bill Clinton’s foot-in-mouth-disease chops during the 16 month campaign.

One week ago Hillary refused to back down; last month Hillary insinuated Obama might see the same fate as Bobby Kennedy, thus making it imperative Hillary stay in the race; Bill Clinton declared Obama was living in a “fairy tale” if he thought he could become president; Hillary herself chastised Obama in their last debate for his affiliation with Reverend Wright and Louis Farrakhan; but Saturday the faux Hillary smile was pasted on as she was forced to bow out and hand her chances for the 2008 election to a man she no more supports than Conservatives support Jimmy Carter.

The question now is will Hillary Clinton become Barry Obama’s Lyndon Johnson? Hillary still has 150 delegates separating her from Barry O which he needs to receive her voter’s support. Hillary’s as heavy-handed as LBJ, if not more, and would, as LBJ did, do everything to undermine the president in order to empower herself further toward the Oval Office.

The truth is Hillary Clinton is no different than LBJ: Johnson was a jealous man who resented anyone receiving more attention than he; LBJ was infamous for his bad temper he unleashed upon people he felt were overshadowing the spotlight he so desired; Johnson insisted upon taking all credit for everything (unless a mistake was made), never letting anyone else share the spotlight—something he did not enjoy doing with JFK. No one was allowed to be more important than Lyndon Johnson, the reason he never had a Chief of Staff; and no White House staffer was actually successful in their work, because Johnson did everything to undermine staffer’s efforts by purposely keeping White House business unorganized.

Those tactics made it possible for Johnson, and only Johnson, to take credit for the Civil Rights Act Republicans are actually responsible for enacting.

Those who think Hillary would not do the same as Vice President are kidding themselves. This is the woman who was co-president to Bill Clinton; Hillary Clinton is the volatile woman who threw lamps at the president’s head when her plans, her bills, her demands, did not go as planned. No matter what Hillary said in her speech, she has all intentions of undermining Barry Obama as Lyndon Johnson did JFK.

Despite everything Hillary said in her snake oil concession speech, she said nothing exceptional or genuinely supportive toward her opposition. Hillary’s speech was her stratagem for the presidency she has every intention of resurrecting in four years. Hillary told the crowd they must fight for women’s rights and gay rights (emphasized twice to let Americans know women and gays have no rights in America), Universal Healthcare, taxes raised on the wealthy and corporate America, making everyone in America, no matter their ancestry or country of birth, welcome.

In other words, illegals and Mark Rich are fully welcome and exempt from the law so long as they vote Democrat and remember Hillary in four years.

Madame Romanov Clinton told her serfs America needs an economy “that is broadly distributed and shared;” but until that day comes America “will always find me on the front lines of democracy.” That would be the democracy of liberals: Marxism.

Hillary informed the crowd of Hillarina’s: “we all know this has been a tough fight, but the Democratic Party is a family…” In that case Dick Cheney should have been there since Cheney, in fact, is family.

This concession speech was no more a surrender or compromise to Obama than Michelle Obama’s college thesis speaks highly of whites in America. Hillary Clinton set herself up for a VP nomination and a 2012 run: If Obama wins and Hillary is picked as VP, she will do everything to ensure Obama’s true colors erupt, his administration fails, and Hillary’s supporters demand she step up to the plate and run against a bankrupt Obama.

It’s entirely possible. Never put anything past the Clinton’s. When the Clinton’s are involved in anything, including endorsing a candidate, they have designs for themselves and themselves only, not the person they are allegedly championing.

The Clinton’s don’t champion anyone; they move in for the kill, demolish, and conquer.

We have not seen the last of Hillary Romanov Clinton. The humble pie pull out was merely the inauguration of a devised strategy for a Hillary Presidency she has every intention of securing no matter who she has to walk over to obtain her objective.

If Obama foolishly nominates Hillary, he better know how to dive over an Oval Office sofa, because Michelle and Hillary will make the Clinton Lamp Wars look like walk in the park with shoes.

OBAMA BEATS HILLARY:
HILLARY BEATS BILL

BY LISA RICHARDS

JUNE 5, 2008

The most liberal politician in America won the Democrat delegates and presidential nomination. Barry Obama, the so-called first black presidential candidate (he’s half white so technically the he’s the first Mullatto presidential candidate) left Hillary Clinton choking on the campaign bus exhaust when comatose Americans voted overwhelmingly for a man who said nothing for 16 months while appeasing liberals with anything they wanted to hear.

Meanwhile Bill Clinton is comatose on the living room floor next to a pile of broken lamps.

Obama has been relentless in his fight for diplomatic tea parties with Iran and Syria. Non-thinking Americans fell for the “charismatic,” “fresh,” “young,” candidate of “change” who explained what he intends to do if president:

“Change is a foreign policy that doesn’t begin and end with a war that should’ve never been authorized and never been waged…what’s not an option is leaving our troops in that country for the next hundred years…and nearly every other threat to America is being ignored.”

I don’t recall Bush or any other Republican stating troops would stay in Iraq for 100 years. As for other threats, that would be Iran’s Holocaust denier Obama wants to befriend.

Obama further declared: “We must be as careful getting out of Iraq as we were careless getting in.” Obama is forgetting the reasons for going into Iraq in were legit: Saddam was given 17 UN Resolutions he violated, six months to hide his weapons as the UN insisted Bush wait while inspectors strolled around the Iraqi desert with their heads in the sands, and 48 hours to get out of Iraq, into exile and no bombing would take place.

That is referred to as diplomacy if Obama needs a definition. Saddam gave diplomacy the finger; Bush gave Saddam what he deserved.

Obama told his followers “It’s time to refocus our efforts on al Qaeda’s leadership and Afghanistan, and rally the world against the common threats of the 21st century— terrorism and nuclear weapons; climate change and poverty; genocide and disease. That’s what change is.”
Has the Senator not heard of the War on Terror? It’s about fighting terrorism, al Qaeda, and stopping the acquisition of nuclear weapons by the enemy. As for climate change, it happens every four months: spring, summer, autumn, and winter.

The great orator further stated: “Change is realizing that meeting today’s threats requires not just our firepower, but the power of our diplomacy—tough, direct diplomacy where the President of the United States isn’t afraid to let any petty dictator know where America stands and what we stand for.”

I believe Bush did that when he carpet-bombed Afghanistan and the Taliban; I believe Bush did that when he dropped a 20 ton Daisy Cutter on Saddam Hussein’s palace.

Obama’s rationalization was that “We must once again have the courage and conviction to lead the free world. That is the legacy of Roosevelt, and Truman, and Kennedy. That’s what the American people want. That’s what change is.”

FDR’s change ushered communism into America via his friendship with “Uncle Joe” Stalin while hiring American communist Alger Hiss; Kennedy is the man who led us into Vietnam, the war all liberals and Democrats blame Republicans for; Kennedy is the president who promised to take down Castro, sent Cubans back to Cuba to wait for U.S. troops and then turned his troops around leaving allied Cubans to get slaughtered on the beach.

Yes, that’s the America we all long for.

Obama is true to keeping up the FDR-style with no-good friends: Washington D.C. bomber William Ayers, his 20 year attendance at a racist church shepherded by a white-hating anti-Semite, his friendship with the radical white priest Father “Flagrant” Pflagler who speaks with a faux Ebonics accent while screaming white castigation.

Despite unexplained friendships with men who hate America, Jews, and anyone white, Obama won the Democrat delegates and nomination without question.

George W. Bush told America his hero is Jesus Christ, he’s pro-life, and Bush was crucified for the display of faith. Liberals across America declared Bush was going to force Evangelical conversion on America while actress Cameron Diaz told Oprah viewers Bush was going to make rape legal in America.

Neither has happened under the Bush Administration; Obama on the other hand can have affiliations with violent thugs and racists and liberals act as if Obama can raise the dead, heal the sick, and walk on water he turns into wine.

Obama’s acceptance speech was appeasement to whiners he has believing middle-class is virtual poverty akin to Calcutta. John McCain, who doesn’t have the guts to smack Obama’s oratorical comments with the truth about the Democrat Poverty Party, is only helping elect Obama by praising Democrats rather than Republicans.

Obama further elucidated: “Change is building an economy that rewards not just wealth, but the work and workers who created it.” The economy rewards all who work, not just the wealthy, otherwise known as the people who create the jobs and sign the paychecks. Obama will not say that. What he does say is the majority of America is struggling while Republicans spend “billions of dollars on more tax breaks for big corporations and wealthy CEOs…”

Obama is a cultural liberal elitist who knows how to talk a good talk and make his followers swoon despite his radical proposals for the country: Universal Healthcare, i.e. socialized medicine, reparations to blacks because a handful of Americans once owned black slaves over a 140 years ago (never mind the fact it was black Africans who sold their people to whites, it’s white America’s fault), free tuition to blacks and Hispanics (it’s not free since tax-payers must pay the way for those who refuse to pay), tax hikes on the wealthy since it’s unconstitutional to become wealthy and horribly wrong to have the means to hire those who need jobs, appeasement talks with Iran who continues threatening to annihilate Israel off the map, appeasement talks with Syria and those lovable little sling-shot champions, the Palestinians, Obama is worried won’t have a homeland if he’s not president.

Bill Clinton was so worried about Palestinians not having a home he tried to give 99% of Israel to Arafat. Obama makes both Clinton’s look like conservatives in comparison.

Obama has affiliations with the Anti-Semite, white-hating Louis Farrakhan and that has not bothered his constituents. Senator Trent Lott gave a happy birthday tribute to 100 year-old ex-Dixiecrat Strom Thurmond, who apologized years ago for his past, and Republicans forced Trent Lott to resign in disgrace.

Still Obama refuses to explain his friendships: when put on the spot Obama simply denounces whoever he’s been associated with without giving a why.

At least with Hillary Clinton Americans know exactly what they are getting: a lying, thieving, adultery enabling, bad-tempered radical feminist married to a serial molester accused of rape who wants the U.S. Europeanized.

Barry Obama calls rural Americans bitter because they own guns, read Bibles, and believe in God and he secures the Democrat nomination. Michelle Obama calls America a “down right mean country” of “great white oppressors” she has not been proud of until this year and her husband acquires the Democrat nomination hands down; Barry Obama declared in one of last summer’s Democrat debates he “does not support the troops,” yet he won the nomination; Obama has been photographed with his hands at his side refusing to pledge allegiance to the flag and liberals crown him king; Obama has snidely refused to wear a flag lapel pin and gullible Americans bow at Obama’s feet.

I’m waiting for the donkey and palms.

Not long ago the Senator claiming he was against going to Iraq (despite the fact he was not elected until a year after the U.S. went to Iraq) wanted to invade Pakistan while pulling U.S. troops out of Iraq. If a Democrat sends troops to war it’s right, just, and unquestionable; if a Republican goes to war to take out a violent dictator it’s the crime of the century.

Bush should have bombed an aspirin factory. At least he would have a good excuse for using superior fire power.

Obama claims he “will always stand up for Israel’s right” to exist in the world while defending the enemy’s rights. Bush should have denied the Holocaust; he would have received a third term.

If Obama wins in November America can look forward to many presidential visits to Camp David from Mahmoud Ahmadinedjad. William Ayers will provide security of course.

Obama Whines Again

by Lisa Richards (more by this author)

Posted 05/27/2008 ET

Barack Obama wants the media, the Tennessee GOP and everyone else to “lay off his wife.”

Obama told ABC’s Good Morning America on May 19, 2008 that “If they [the GOP] think that they’re going to try to make Michelle an issue in this campaign, they should be careful because that I find unacceptable, the notion that you start attacking my wife or my family.”

But the problem Obama has is that his wife is out there, a surrogate speaker in his campaign, saying a lot of things Americans find almost as offensive as what his former pastor, Rev. Jeremiah Wright, said in church for decades. Obama admitted that Wright was a legitimate issue. So why isn’t what his wife says on the campaign trail? In truth, she is.

Unless Obama can stop his wife from saying things on the campaign trail that deserve criticism, he cannot reasonably ask Americans to disregard what she says.

In Bill and Hillary, we had a “co-presidency.” Obama, like the dutiful husband, always brags of his wife’s influence on him. So if the Obama family is offering another “twofer” deal like the Clintons did, why shouldn’t Michelle O. -- her beliefs, her statements and her political commitments -- be looked at as closely as we have looked at Hillary’s since 1992?

Michelle Obama has made herself an issue by constantly attacking America. Perhaps she should be more careful with her choice of words. Telling American’s you’ve never felt pride until your forty fifth year on earth says the civil rights movement, and all its achievements, meant nothing to you. It says the Berlin Wall coming down was insignificant to you, that the downfall of communism was not worth mentioning, Saddam Hussein’s removal was inconsequential, taking down the Taliban was trivial, and Iraqi’s voting in free elections is irrelevant.

The Tennessee GOP simply exercised its right to free speech with an ad showing Michelle Obama’s very own anti-American remarks last February to Wisconsin voters in which she proclaimed she had not felt proud to be an American until that February Fonda moment.

The Tennessee GOP ad features proud Tennesseans speaking out on their life-long pride for America in a four minute YouTube video that is not going over well with Obama who labeled it “Low class.”

That’s not far off the mark of what Obama basically called the proud people of Pennsylvania when he essentially described them as bitter God-gunning Bible boobs.

It’s acceptable for Barry Obama to insult America, and it’s fine with the Senator if his wife trashes America as a callous country despite America giving Michelle Obama the best Ivy League educations and high paying jobs. But Heaven forbid the GOP giving the Obamas what democracy -- the small “d” democracy -- serves up for every pol.

If Barry Obama does not want anyone talking about his wife’s nasty anti-American comments, Obama should bar his wife from the campaign stage. If Obama does not want the GOP discussing everything Michelle Obama froths out, then Obama should stop her from saying things that are more than a little controversial.

Since that’s as unlikely as Bill Clinton being faithful to his wife, Obama had better get used to the fact many Americans see through him and his unpatriotic wife and their unholy alliances with anti-American race-baiters and radical former terrorist bombers.

What Americans owe each other is a patriotic president with a wife who has no intention of following in Hillary Clinton’s over-bearing, politically grasping, West Wing-climbing steps.

John McCain has done everything to push conservative voters away: he is against interrogating terrorists who have no problem lopping off the heads of the U.S. military. Water boarding on the other hand is cruel and unusual punishment; John McCain signed the Amnesty Bill to allow free-loading illegals entrance and protection in the U.S. while stealing American’s tax dollars, jobs, education, and healthcare; remember those fabulous “Z Visas” McCain wanted granted to all illegals living in the U.S. for five years? John McCain even placed a gag order on free speech with his McCain-Feingold Bill and voted against the Bush tax-cuts twice, but will support them for the 2008 vote.

This is the same man who told Tim Russert back in 2005 that he felt Hillary Clinton “would make a good president.”

Now it would seem John McCain is running as Al Gore without the Grecian Formula.

Back in 2004, John McCain let his support of all things green become well known as he told the Senate the North Pole's climate temperatures were rising. McCain gave his alleged proof by-way-of the International Commission known as Arctic Climate Impact Assessment.

The Nation Magazine proudly discussed McCain’s greenness in a 2004 article and his statement that human beings are the cause of global warming. The Senator said while on a trip to the Arctic he witnessed with his own eyes the Arctic rapidly melting before his eyes: “it was remarkable going up on a small ship next to this glacier and seeing where it had been just 10 short years ago and how quickly it’s receded.”

Al Gore had a moment like that when he watched his hair rapidly recede and his weight rapidly increase.

Most of ACIA’s members are from the North Pole area: Canada, the land of liberals hiding U.S. AWOL-ers, Denmark, Finland, Iceland—there’s a reason we call it that since it’s a mound of ice, Norway, and Russia, the country with thousands of miles of thick Perma Frost covering its northern border.

Fast forward four years to Monday May 13, 2008 and John McCain has further incarnated into Al Gore in a speech at a Portland, Oregon Wind Turbine Manufacturer where McCain stated he supports the Cap-and-Trade System he and other environmental loons claim will reduce the domestic carbon emissions caused by humans with the utter gall to drive cars and fly in planes.

According to the liberal authoritative source of all things true, the New York Times, McCain “called for a mandatory limit on greenhouse gas emissions in the United States to combat climate change,” and further stated he would not “shirk the mantle of leadership [President Bush has ignored] that the United States bears, I will not permit eight long years to pass without serious action on serious challenges.”

And thus The Nation magazine was correct in 2004 when calling McCain an Environmental Republican. I can think of a few things to call him, but they’re not printable.

One thing I will say is John McCain is helping the Democrats into the White House by shoving conservatives in front of the on coming train of liberal ideology.

McCain scored points with liberals as he further stated that “global warming demands our urgent attention, especially in Washington.” Either McCain believes this load of damaging gas emitting manure he’s spewing or he’s trying desperately to court the liberal vote away from Hillary and Obama. Either way it is manure since all politicians fly around in jets that use fuel, drive in gigantic SUV’s the rest of us are condemned for driving because they use fuel, and live in large oil heated houses.

According to Senator McCain, the most credible scientists around the world have proof “that time is short and the dangers [to the planet] are great.”

That would be the five long-haired bearded guys wearing Star Trek T-shirts who have been living in an isolated trailer on the North Pole for 30 years freezing their butts off and looking for any excuse to get the hell out of the North Pole.

McCain stated he is in full support of the bogus Kyoto Protocol he slammed Bush for not embracing, calling the lack of support for the environmental gimmick a “dead-end,” and “failed diplomacy.” Maybe that’s because Kyoto really is a dead-end failure.

McCain has also blames Bush for not reacting quickly enough to Hurricane Katrina victims. Apparently Bush should have swam in and saved everyone in New Orleans who Mayor Nagin refused to bus out because he’s a crook who had no time to save his own people. Thus the blame always lies with the Republicans, not the Louisiana Democrats who refused to build stronger Levees with the money those Democrats pocketed.

McCain’s Oregon speech is not the speech of a conservative; it is the rhetoric of a liberal Democrat. John McCain is now officially the third Democrat in the race for the White House Republicans must hold onto in order to stop this country from becoming the next EU-style nation.

McCain knows full well a Cap-Trade System will only hurt the country and the economy while it destroys businesses.

According to the May 13, 2008 Wall Street Journal, John McCain intends to accomplish his greenhouse clean-up by placing an “emissions ceiling on all electric power, transportation fuels—their go low prices at the tank and cheap air travel—commercial business and industries.” In other words, he is going to fine all businesses with heavy penalties the American people will suffer through ala Jimmy Carter.

McCain told Oregon he will give industries “permits” every time they use less carbon emissions. Barack Obama says he will “auction” off the “permits” to businesses and industries. Either way the plan is the same tax-hiking liberal punishment Democrats love to use as weapons against business and industry they so hate despite owning stock in everything they try to destroy.

If you can’t smell the barrel of pork frying in the pan you might be a liberal.

For everyone who lived through the 1970’s, think Jimmy Carter all over again, because that is what McCain’s plan is: a promise to impose a carbon footprint in the U.S. rear via Washington liberals.

McCain’s plans are in synch with Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama: enormous tax-hiking punishments for using gasoline to fuel houses, cars, airplanes, and every type of industry liberals want out of business.

Like Hillary and Obama, McCain is against drilling in ANWAR. It might upset the growing Polar Bear population liberals claim is dying out due to melting glaciers that will pour down upon New York City any day now. Like his two liberal counterparts, McCain is against building new oil refineries which would make the U.S. independent from cheap Saudi Oil; McCain is against building new nuclear power plants to solve the energy crisis all three candidates claim America is suffering from; and as McCain proved when he slammed North Carolina voters, he too is against coal mining expansion but not putting people out of work.

John McCain would rather Al Gore-it to every American while he and Al Gore fly in their private jets, drive their SUV’s, and collect oil stocks they are both heirs to.

John McCain needs to get in to his liberal-minded brain that Republicans are trying to hold on to the White House not hand it over to two socialist libertines. John McCain may not be a conservative but the least he can do is stop acting like Al Gore and act like a conservative to win the election and keep the Democrats out of the White House.

DOUGLAS DEMANDS ANOTHER ROUND FROM LINCOLN

BY LISA RICHARDS

APRIL 28, 2008

Apparently the Lincoln-Douglas debate was not good enough the first time around; Hillary Clinton wants to reenact the 1858 debate.

Someone might want to point out to Senator Clinton that historical reenactments take place on battlefields. Besides, we already know how the Lincoln-Douglas Debate turned out and neither Clinton nor Obama are Lincoln. Although I would love to see the two reenact the Civil War with both candidates on the Confederate side; preferably in Atlanta with Sherman breathing down their necks.

Still, Hillary Clinton, who trails Obama in delegates, wants to debate Senator Obama Lincoln-Douglas-style before the May 6, 2008 Democratic Primaries in North Carolina and Indiana. In other words, Clinton wants a free-for-all one-on-one debate without moderator’s controlling her Grammy Award winning easy-to-tears acting and her shrilly Margaret Mitchell impersonations during defensive, rhetorical loss-of-control come-backs versus Obama’s questionably bitter slap-in-the-face descriptions of Middle America he uses to unite the all white racist nation by-way-of his questionable affiliations with America-damning preachers and Washington bombers.

Obama declined the invitation, telling Fox News’s Chris Wallace he has debated Hillary “21 times” and is “not ducking” the invitation to a “contest,” because he said no. Obama told Wallace “For two weeks, [and in] two big states, we want to make sure we’re talking to as many voters on the ground, [and] taking questions from voters [and] not…hav[ing] debates between now and Indiana.”

That’s too bad because I hear Hillary Clinton is quite the avid duck hunter.

Now we’re all left to wonder how the reenactment of Lincoln versus Douglas would turn out in 2008. I’m wondering if perhaps Bill Clinton warned Obama off, being the victim himself of many lamp-to-the-head injuries by a woman who must always have things her way if one wants to live to see the next day with their shoes on.

After 21 debates what could these two Democrat-Socialists possibly have to argue over that America has not seen and heard over the last very long year and a half? They both stand for Universal Healthcare; both support welfare, free education, despise wealthy people despite being in that class, and prefer stealing from the rich to give to those living off taxpayers they feel don’t pay their fair share.

I would like to know how many tax exemptions Reverend Wright gets.

Notwithstanding Hillary’s attempts to court the South and Mid-West, like Obama, she is anti-Second Amendment: both candidates want to take guns out of the hands of law-abiding Americans while letting violent criminals continue getting their wrists slapped like naughty children after shooting innocent Americans with illegal weapons.

Obama voted against a bill that would give the death penalty to gangs in his home state; so we know where Obama stands on punishing violent killers and terrorists who blow things up—the same place as Hillary Clinton who was close friends with Yasser Arafat.

Both candidates want taxes raised on the upper-class—that would be the people who hire Americans. Regardless of what both candidates claim, they will in fact raise taxes on the middle-class in order to give lower-income, welfare-“earning” Americans more free money to live off. Democrats never give tax breaks, the prefer tax-takes.

Obama is running on the fact he claims to be the first black presidential candidate; Hillary is married to the first black president. The Clintons invented themselves as the modern day Kennedy’s; Obama and Michelle have done the same—without hair bands, lesbians, dead men, and molested women.

Hillary Clinton once insulted women who bake chocolate chip cookies and stand by their men as some form of weakness; Obama insulted rural Americans as bitter gun-owners clinging to God.

Bill Clinton on the other hand did cling to his unused Bible every Sunday.

Both candidates are married to exemplary paradigms of American pride: Obama’s wife referred to whites as “the Great White Oppressors” in her college thesis and declared this year is the first time in her 40+ years she is proud of America. Bill Clinton was so proud of America as a youth, he refused to fight for America, dodged the draft, and ran off to England to attend Oxford University where he learned to smoke pot without inhaling.

Obama on the other hand did inhale and alleges to cocaine use. At least liberals are consistent with their drug use.

What more could Hillary possibly debate Obama on? They’ve discussed every issue they stand which are nothing more than a European Union socialist agenda to turn America into a welfare state further beholden to the government democrats would increase in size. Hillary has already told Obama she, unlike Obama, would have distanced herself from men like Wright and Farrakhan. Of course one must forget her long-time friendship with Jew-killer Yasser Arafat and her college affiliation with the Black Panthers.

Hillary made it clear to the press she disagreed with Obama’s comments to the people of Pennsylvania despite the fact she wants rip guns out of the hands of all law-abiding.

The only difference between Hillary and Obama is he is half black and Hillary is half pseudo-Jew. Other than that both have radical affiliations—Weathermen, Panthers, and Mena, Arkansas drug dealers—and both are as phony as Jimmy Carter pledging his allegiance to the American flag.

If another democrat debate was to take place, the only one worth watching would be that of Michelle Obama debating Bill Clinton on which one of them would make the best First Lady. Both have spouses who insult America and both think they’re above everyone. Michelle is the oppressed-by-whites lady who is willing to stand by her man and support whatever he wants and Bill is the oppressive lady’s man who consistently competes for media attention by standing on his wife’s platform as if it’s his own.

And both are married to men.

The fact is Hillary and Obama already reenacted the firing on Fort Sumter in every debate; both have shot themselves in their feet shoved in their molars so often it’s pathetic to watch. Basically there’s nothing left to watch. Unless the of course the two would agree to gloves and a ring and go at it like real men. Then we would finally have a political debate people would watch.

www.lisa-richards.com

BLACK LIBERATION THEOLOGY: BLACK JIHAD

BY LISA RICHARDS

April 18, 2008

Presidential Candidate Senator Barack Obama’s nutty pastor declared all blacks should turn on whites, Jesse Jackson referred to New York City as Hymie Town, the Black Panthers have declared over the years that white women should be raped, blacks should separate themselves from whites, live in separate neighborhoods from whites, not befriend whites because whites are blue-eyed devils. This was part of the “back to Africaness” movement of the 60’s. And let’s not forget black rappers who sing about raping women and murdering cops: white women and cops.

Obama’s referred to his white grandmother as a “typical white person.” Apparently the poor woman was afraid of a harassing pan-handler. Obama and his lazy grandfather never walked the white women to the bus stop where she was constantly harassed in order to stop the man. Why; the man in question was black. Obama considered the man a brother and the fact his grandmother was afraid of the thug did not upset him; what upset him was his grandmother’s fear—it made him feel whites were against his black brothers. I guess he forgot he’s also white. That much is obvious.

So why Obama’s grandma statements are so important is they go along with his beliefs and what those beliefs teach, beliefs that are taught in his church.

Obama held a press conference to explain away his statements calling his grandmother a racist. His “typical white person” rhetoric was pathetic and typical of black racism toward whites. But it was used to take the heat off Obama’s racist black supremacist pastor who incites white-hate into his Sunday sermons and Obama himself who has been a regular member of a Black Liberation Theology teaching church for 20 years and refuses to leave despite the racist preaching and teaching.

Obama has stated he sees no reason to leave such a church now that Reverend Wright has retired. So in other words, it’s okay to continue practicing racist theology so long as the whacko who gained attention for Obama’s hidden beliefs is no longer the preacher on the pulpit.

How will Mr. Hussein Obama explain Reverend Moss, the new preacher of his church, who claims the white media, is lynching that poor racist black church and makes inflammatory statements against whites? Obama doesn’t explain. Why should he when he has attended a Black Liberation Theology Church for 20 years and refuses to leave despite its black supremacist teachings and belief?

Black Liberation Theology, an insane concept created and used to brainwash gullible blacks in America by James Cone, states: “Black theology refuses to accept a God who is not identified totally with the goals of the black community. If God is not for us [blacks] and against white people, then he [God] is a murderer, and we [blacks] had better kill him [God]. The task of black theology is to kill gods who do not belong to the black community.”

According to the Bible, we are all created in HIS image, not a black or white image, but God’s image. According to Black Liberation Theology founder James Cone, if God has any love for whites, if God died for one, single white person, then God must be murdered.

James Cone further states in his theology doctrine of black supremacy: “Black theology will accept only the love of God which participates in the destruction of the white enemy.”

In other words God better kill whites. Again, Obama is half white.

The Koran, the do