NUTS TOSSED OVER THE CUCKOO’S NEST

BY LISA RICHARDS

October 1, 2007

Americans  had to hear about Bill exposing “his” in the Oval Office for eight long years, now  Hillary is trying to shove her big tush back in the doors of the White House while attempting to rob every American tax-payer of more money for lazy parents.

According to Madame Romanov she would like every child born on U.S. soil to receive a check for $5,000 dollars, which will be put into an account collecting interest—off tax-payers of course—until the child reaches age 18.  Those children could include children of illegal aliens.  Hillary did not state children of illegals would be included in her proposal, but anyone with a brain knows illegally born children will be bought for votes if Clinton’s proposal can make it to Washington.

It’s not enough the free-loading thieves of America crash U.S. borders, stealing  jobs and paychecks after crossing and dropping babies on U.S. soil in the process of invasion, the Mexican takeover might get paid for illegal birthings.

Hillary Clinton is trying to pick America’s pockets for Hispanic/black/illegal votes.

This is Hillary’s socialist attempt to return America to Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society when women who refused to work for a living were paid by hijacked taxpayers to have babies for a living.  Welfare mother’s made a lot of money popping out babies for cash.  Hillary wants them to have a chance to do so again.

What a nice career for young women: opt out of high school and college, make money getting pregnant, pimp yourself for Hillary votes.   Women of suffrage would be so proud.

It is estimated this nutty sham could cost Americans $20 billion in taxes.    $50 billion is already paid annually in welfare taxes to illegals alone.  That would up the welfare lottery to $70 billion more annually, and that doesn’t include all welfare recipients.

According to Hillary,she “like[s] the idea of giving every baby born in America a $5,000 account that would grow over time, so when that young person turns 18, if they have finished high school, they would be able to access it to go to college.”

This is welfare every way you look at it and slice it.   These kids are not going to go to college if this attempt at a LBJ bill gets passed.  The kids will cash the money and use it as down payments on black sports cars with dark tinted windows and 4X5 foot speakers in the trunks blaring voodoo drumbeats to loud, pounding bass rhythms.

This is also European Socialism.  Europe is a welfare haven and many E.U. states are broke as a result of post WWII welfare for life. 



Hillary claims her plan will enable future 18 year-olds to put down-payments on homes with the $8,512 dollars in interest accumulated over 18 years. Where does anyone in America put eight grand down on a home?  18 years from now eight grand will be worth two cents Hillary.   Taxpayers will have the privilege of saying they spent $20 billion yearly to purchase homes for the children of the lazy.

Hillary claims her plan will help paid-for-by-the-taxpayers children pay for college tuition.   Most colleges now cost $150,000 dollars for a Bachelor’s degree? Again; this is Hillary’s way of reinstituting LBJ’s Great Society back into America and what author Marvin Olasky stated in The Tragedy of American Compassion as  something considered degradation by all races before 1960: “Until the 1960’s,” Olasky said,  “the public dole was humiliation.  Soon young men would be told that shining shoes was demeaning, and that accepting government subsidy meant a person could at least keep his dignity.”

It starts again.  Convincing a certain group of Americans they never have to work for a living when there are taxpayers to pay the way.

In FDR’s New Legacy is the Life of the Lie, author Jacob G. Hornberger stated: the “New deal [enacted by FDR] ‘rejected’ America’s foundations of the values of freedom and equality making many live what might be called ‘the life of the lie’ or the life that denies reality.”  If people would wake up, they would realize Hillary Clinton is trying to deny blacks and Hispanics a normal life in order to become president.

Madame Romanov’s husband was forced to sign the August 22, 1996 bill titled Personal Responsibility And Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act—PRWORA—into law, dismantling the deteriorating welfare system.  According to the Administration For Children & Families, Clinton’s PRWORA demanded twenty-five percent of all welfare recipients in each state enter the workforce after two years assistance.  Single parents had to work twenty hours a week for the first year of welfare assistance, thirty hours the second year, becoming full-fledged members of the work-force.

Presidential hopeful Hillary wants Americans to pay for the birthing of other people’s children.  Why not just give the kids the title papers to every American taxpayers home, minus the mortgage payments of course, we wouldn’t want welfare recipients to feel they owe anyone a living.

 According to Professor Thomas Sowell, Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institute: “there is a fundamental difference between seeking the truth and scoring points.  In politics, the truth is strictly optional and that also seems to be true in parts of the media”  In Sowell’s article “Myths of the Rich,” he speaks of how the media and politicians convince minorities that they are poor and always will be.  Therein lays the brainwashing-into-welfare.

Hillary and liberals need poor people.  Liberals will be out of jobs if Americans, especially black and Hispanics on welfare, wake up and realize liberals do not want them rich, educated and holding their heads up high.  Liberals need ghettoed poor blacks and Hispanics voting democrat; liberals need uneducated blacks and Hispanics to never rise up out of poverty liberals like Hillary keep them in for the race-card vote.

Hillary wants as many Americans born into welfare as possible.  It is the only way she can grab the low-income black and Hispanic vote and take over America.

Hey Britney, maybe if you promise Hillary a vote,she’ll buy your kids off K-Fed.

copyright 2007 Lisa Richards

www.lisa-richards.com

E-mail: lisa-richards@lisa-richards.com

TO CHRIS WALLACE:

DO YOU HAVE ANY IDEA HOW HARD IT IS TO CATCH A GUY WHEN YOUR PANTS ARE DOWN?

BY LISA RICHARDS

September 30, 2006

Hillary is angry Fox News’ Chris Wallace for questioning her husband’s ethics concerning Osama bin Laden.  Hillary is further miffed over that black chick, her name is Condi, tactfully putting the usurping New York Senator in her place by stating President Bush and his administration have worked tirelessly on the bin Laden case.

Unlike Bill Clinton who worked tirelessly to procure women.

Bill Clinton should have told Chris Wallace  he tried for eight, long years to get bin Laden, but do you have any idea Chris just how difficult it is to chase after someone when your pants are down around your knees?”

At least the ex-president would have been telling the truth versus lying like that well-used Oval Office rug.

The Hill is not going to let the Bill-bashing go.  Clintons have difficulty parting with things—White House antiques, women, Vince Foster’s shoes, National Security Vault documents, and the limelight.  They just can’t let go.

I don’t know who to thank more, Chris Wallace or Hillary Clinton for refusing to drop the interview that ended Sunday September 24, 2006 with Bill Clinton screaming his way out of Fox’s Washington Headquarters.  Apparently Bill’s staff was supposed to jump in and beat Chris for questioning Clinton’s failing actions.

Thanks to Chris Wallace’s acting like a real journalist, unlike David Gregory who would have broke out the Kleenex and wept along with Clinton on how difficult it is to be an over aged liar with a full head of hair, the Clinton’s are showing their colors.  They are after all the first black couple.

This has to be choking Jimmy Carter around his Lilly-livered, skinny neck: his limelight addiction has been blacked-out and defused by an even dumber, sneakier, storytelling prevaricator of allegorical myths.

All that Commie-kissing and Middle Eastern destruction of democracy was supposed to keep carter's face in the cameras for life. Then that hick from Hope came along and had sex with his staff. 



The Clinton’s aren’t going to take this defamation of their cut-throat characters lying down—this time.   Hillary is going to let America know just how hard her husband tried to pull his pants up every time he heard her thunderous voice howling in the halls.  After all, this is the man who can dodge a lamp at light speed.  This is the President who was able to phone world leaders while Monica performed her diplomatic duties.  Let’s just see Bush try that!

Hillary forgot to mention what a good Christian her husband is.  After sex with that woman,he attended church, bible in hand, weekly for the cameras.  

If Hillary were elected the only happy people would be the Palestinians who would be offered 100 percent of Israel.

 Copyrite September 30, 2006 Lisa Richards

BILL CLINTON DEFENDS HIS FAILURE OVER NOT CAPTURING BIN LADEN:

HE BLAMES BUSH FOE EIGHT YEARS OF CLINTON MISTAKES

BY LISA RICHARDS

September 25, 2006

Fox News's Chris Wallace had Bill Clinton red-faced with anger.  Chris Wallace had the gall to ask Clinton “Why didn’t you do more to put bin Laden and Al Qaeda out of business when you were president?  There’s a new book out…called The Looming Tower. It talks about how the fact that when you pulled troops out of Somalia in 1993, bin Laden said, 'I’ve seen the frailty and the weakness and the cowardice of U.S. troops.'  Then there was the bombing of the embassies in Africa and the attack on the Cole.”

Clinton does not like having his failures and inadequacies laid out publicly.  The Hill Billy uproar ignited into full-blown, lamp-toss anger.

Wallace went on to state bin Laden “separated his leaders, spread them around, because he expected an attack, and there was no response.”

Bill Clinton never responded to Black Hawke Down.  He let our men die without retribution.

“Ok,” Clinton responded with put-out-beyond-arrogance. “Let’s talk about it.” The ex-president snidely remarked. “I’m being asked this on the FOX network.” He implied defensively as if CNN would never do this to him.  Actually they would not.

Clinton was  irritated, his teeth were gnashing, he cut Wallace off consistently throughout the entire one hour lie-athon.  At the beginning of the interview Wallace asked Clinton about the $7 billion he pledged this week at the Global Initiative Forum in New York.  Clinton bragged like an over inflated stuffed shirt.  Clinton loved describing how he is ending AIDS, poverty, injustice to blacks by evil whites, and the fact he is the only president ever to raise the economy. 


 

Bill Clinton was happy to brag about his money raising charities, but Wallace had to ask the questions millions of e-mailers demanded Wallace pose to the ex-president who had many chances to catch bin Laden yet did nothing.

Clinton complained this was a Fox News ploy and that ABC had sent in a “right-winger” to “run their little pathway to 9/11,” falsely claiming it was "based on the 9/11 Commission Report, with three things asserted against me directly!”

Clinton got in Wallace’s face with fingers pointing.  Clinton  indignantly stated he tried for eight years to get bin Laden and failed. “But at least I tried” he claimed even though he failed.

That made as much sense as electing him President of the United States for eight  years.

Dick Morris stated he sat in the Oval Office with Clinton and Gore when the CIA told the two men bin Laden was a threat, a danger and must be taken into custody or taken out.  They refused to take the would-be invader and killer of 3,000 American souls?

CIA Analyst and Clinton Administration advisor Mansoor Ijaz of Benadoor Associates publicly described his imploring Clinton and Gore to take the known terrorist involved in the 1993 World Trade attack and many other attacks on the U.S. before he attacked America again.

September 24, 2006  Americans  heard Bill Clinton describe his many attempts to capture the guy who was handed to him on a silver platter by Mansoor Ijaz, the guy who worked out the deal with the Saudis to hand bin Laden over to U.S. authorities.

Ijaz  stated publicly that Clinton and Gore insisted bin Laden was not a threat to the U.S. Dick Morris states the same claims as Ijaz.  Mansoor Ijaz and Dick Morris were never mentioned in the interview, not even by Wallace.  Ijaz and Morris can state they tried to get Clinton to cooperate and take the terrorist.

According to Clinton he wanted to stay in Somalia after the Black Hawke went down but Republicans made him pull out.

Monica and her services to the president were of imperative presidential urgency. The president needed sex.

The entire interview was like watching the Rosenberg’s declare they never sold those top secret A-Bomb secrets to the Russians even though they were caught red-handed with the files.

Chris Wallace remained pleasant and respectful of the Oval office playboy, never once accusing, rather asking legitimate questions Americans want answers to.

 Clinton lost control and never regained it.  He doesn’t work well with calm people, which explains the Jerry Springer free-for-all lamp tossing escapades widely documented between Hill and Bill.  Clinton seems to love brawls not decorum.

Wallace told Clinton bin Laden accused him [Clinton] and the country of displaying weakness by pulling out of Somalia, and that it made us look weak.  Clinton denied the accusation from bin Laden stating: “But it wouldn’t have shown the weakness if we’d left right away, but he [bin Laden] wasn’t involved in that [Somalia].  That's bull."


 

Clinton went on to insist the entire Somalia incident was about a Muslim Warlord named Mohammad Adid who murdered 22 Pakistani troops.  Clinton claimed our mission there was purely humanitarian, not to get bin Laden or keep him or anyone out, then insisted Adid was not a religious fanatic.  That’s why he murdered American soldiers by blowing them out of the skies and torturing them to death in the streets Islam-style.  Clinton also insisted Al Qaeda was nowhere in Somalia.  Of course not, they're in  U.S. universities studying chemistry.

There was one consistent theme throughout the entire interview: Richard Clarke. Bill Clinton injected Clarke’s name into every answer with praise.  Wallace tried to quote the 9/11 Commission Report, but Clinton would have none of it.  Richard Clarke was far superior to anything a Senate Armed Committee could perform. “The U.S. government took the threat seriously,” Wallace said referring to bin Laden and Bush. “But not in the sense of mustering anything like the kind of effort that would be gathered to confront an enemy of first, second, or even third rank.”

“That’s not true!” Clinton spewed with venom. “Let’s look at what Richard Clarke said.”

Clinton sited Richard Clarke whom Clinton angrily said was demoted by Bush.

Clinton went on to smear Republicans and Neo-Cons—the new Conservatives known as Reaganites.  Clinton asserted Neo-Cons stopped him from capturing bin Laden; they stopped the CIA, whom Clinton said he authorized to kill the terrorist. Clinton stated there never was a “comprehensive anti-terror-operation” until he was president.

SLUNG WITH THE WIND

By Lisa Richards

January 23, 2006

According to Madame Hillary “Romanov” Clinton “the White House is run like a plantation, and you know what I’m talking about.”

Why not come out and call  Republicans what she believes republicans are: a bunch of black-haters with glorious slavery-memories of the past, rippin’ food out of black babies mouths in the South after we purposely broke the Levees in order to drown every Southern black, because we want the South white.



Senator Clinton does not have the guts to actually say  that way because she knows it is not true.  Hillary must try to brainwash black Americans into believing white Republicans hate blacks and want a return to “the plantation.”

Madame Clinton claimed  the Bush administration would “go down in history as one of the worst that has ever governed our country.”  The usurping Senator from Illinois/Arkansas/New York might want to avoid hurling boulders at glass houses, especially when it was her husband’s administration that ran the best little whore house in Washington D.C.  Bill Clinton refused to imprison Osama bin Laden when the Saudi’s offered him up on a silver platter, refused to retaliate for the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center in which bin Laden was linked, the slaughter of our troops in Magu Dishu, the bombing of the U.S.S. Cole that took the lives of American sailors, the Kobar Towers, the U.S. embassy in Tanzania. 




Clinton started a war in  Bosnia and Croatia in order to cover up the fact that he was uncovering a girl out of her blue dress.  Then there’s the infamous bombing of an aspirin factory in which Clinton claimed he missed his target—Osama bin Laden—when trying to hit the terrorist.

He never missed the woman under the Oval Office desk.

Clinton  lied under oath to the Senate about the staff laying under him and his refusal to let a women testify at his trial, which subsequently got him impeached.

There is the Tyson Chicken scandal, Hillary’s Black Panther days supporting the group’s racial hating of whites and desire to rape and kill as many as possible.  Hillary supported the PLO while pretending to be a Jew.  This is the woman photographed hugging Suha Arafat, who she claimed Jews poisoned Palestinian children.

Scandal after scandal and Senator Clinton has the sauce to claim George W. Bush has the worst administration in history.  George W. Bush  freed 50 million people from slavery and slaughter, destroyed the Taliban in retaliation for destroying two American cities and 3,000 innocent souls, put two blacks in the position of Secretary of the State, made a Mexican Attorney General and another Secretary of transportation, and stated America will never turn its back on Israel. 


 

The only mistake George Bush is making is not closing and securing the borders. Bill Clinton on the other hand never bothered to close his pants or secure his zipper.

Calling  Republicans plantation owners is not considered bad behavior.  Neither is getting sexual favors in the Oval Office from the staff.  Just a little mistake we should all forget.  George Bush says God Bless you and quotes scriptures in public and he’s considered a menace to society and destructive to American life.

George Bush tried not to leave one, single child behind with the help of Ted Kennedy.  Bad idea.  Ted Kennedy is the guy who left a girl behind in a car full of water to drown so he wouldn’t miss last call on Martha’s Vineyard.  Never trust a guy who left a woman behind to drown to not leave children behind.

George W. Bush has been trying to reform Social Security, hoping Democrats would go along with his plan so seniors can keep every dime they made.  Again, not a good idea.  Democrats had a president who considered Social Security something women provide you with in bed.

Hillary Clinton might want to second guess her words before they spew forth from her baneful yap; her party and her husband’s administration are the cornerstones of booze, booty, and blunder.   Democrats have prevaricated and pusillanimously played with politics to destruction.

If anything ever resembled a plantation it was the lying, thieving, whoring, destructive Clinton Administration that never did anything to advance the black population.  The only advances Bill Clinton has ever made are sexual.

Does Hillary “Romanov” Clinton really think she can win the 2008 election with her demeanor and personality?  Who does the Senator think the American people will vote for, a screeching shrew reminiscent of a Linda Blair movie or the soft-spoken, all American, lady-like sweetheart from Birmingham, Alabama?  The woman who accepts her husbands infidelity in order to gain power, or the woman who worked her way out of segregation with dignity and a complete lack of resentment to become the most powerful woman in the world?

And if the front runner of the Republican Party is not Secretary Rice but a man, do Americans want a woman who lets her husband openly cheat while defending his actions and has a past that reads like the Gotti family rap sheet?

Americans would rather have Ralph Nader and he’s never received more than three votes.  Give it up Madame Senator, you and your party have gone the way of Tara—with the wind.

 Copyrite January 23, 2006 Lisa Richards